All Weekend, Every Weekend. On C-SPAN3.

Is the Individual Mandate to Purchase Health Care Coverage Constitutional?

Washington, DC
Tuesday, March 27, 2012

The individual mandate portion of the law goes into effect on January 1, 2014. It requires virtually all Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a fine. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard two hours of oral argument.

The government’s ability to require everyone to buy insurance depends in part on another provision of the Act that goes into effect at the same time, which requires health insurance companies to provide affordable insurance for everyone, even people who had previously been unable to obtain insurance because they suffer from “pre-existing conditions.”

The Court will consider whether the individual mandate is in fact constitutional.  This issue boils down to whether Congress has the power to enact a law requiring everyone in the United States to buy health insurance or pay a penalty.

The Obama Administration argues that it does under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause.  They argue that the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to “regulate Commerce . . . among the states.”

The government’s primary argument is based on the idea that an individual’s decision not to buy health insurance affects interstate commerce because that person will inevitably end up needing medical care and if this individual does not have health insurance, will ultimately be unable to pay the health bill. This cost will then be absorbed by health care providers, who will then pass that cost to the insurance companies, who in turn pass it to the people who do buy insurance.

The challengers take a very different view.  They characterize the individual mandate as an unprecedented effort by Congress to regulate inactivity (in the form of the refusal to buy health insurance).  If Congress can require everyone in the United States to buy insurance, they argue, there would be virtually no limits to what Congress can rely on the Commerce Clause to do. It’s a slippery slope argument.

Division of Time:
1 hour: U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli
30 minutes: 26 states (Paul Clement)
30 minutes: National Federation of Independent Business (Michael Carvin)

The 26 States in the lawsuit before the Supreme Court are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Updated: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 3:55pm (ET)

Related Events

Cato Institute Explores Effects of 'Citizens United' Ruling
Wednesday, January 23, 2013     

The Cato Institute hosts a pair of panel discussions on campaign finance and how the Supreme Court's ruling in the "Citizen's United" case has affected the funding of campaigns and political action committees (PACs).

Justice Ginsburg Discusses Her Career & Supreme Court Cases
Thursday, November 22, 2012     

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently sat down for a conversation at the University of Colorado's Law School.

Supreme Court Justice Kennedy Addresses Heritage Foundation
Wednesday, October 24, 2012     

The Heritage Foundation held its annual Joseph Story lecture on "The Constitution and its Promise" with Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Lawyers Discuss Supreme Court Cases on Sniffer Dog Use
Tuesday, October 23, 2012     

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers held a discussion on two Florida privacy cases which the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on.

Justice Roberts Discusses Constitutional Law
Thursday, October 18, 2012     

In October, Chief Justice Roberts was at Rice University in Houston, where he addressed students at the university, touching on issues ranging from challenges to the Constitution to his favorite movie. In his remarks, Roberts stated that reporters are too quick to label Supreme Court Justices as liberal or conservative.

Retired Justice Stevens Addresses Gun Rights Cases
Monday, October 15, 2012     

At an event hosted by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence's Legal Action Project, Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens discussed gun laws and the second amendment.

Attorneys Discuss Supreme Court Arguments on Human Rights Case
Tuesday, October 2, 2012     

Supreme Court justices heard oral arguments in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, a case brought by 12 Nigerian nationals against oil companies they alleged used the Nigerian military to block protests against Shell's drilling operations.

Encore Q&A: John Paul Stevens
Saturday, September 29, 2012     

Retired U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens discusses his book, "Five Chiefs," a memoir which details the workings of the Supreme Court from Stevens’ personal experiences with the five most recent chief justices. As the third longest serving Supreme Court Justice in American history, John Paul Stevens recounts his dealings with each individual chief justice, beginning with the 1947 term and culminating in his resignation at the end of the 2010 term.

The Federalist Society Previews the Upcoming Supreme Court Term
Thursday, September 27, 2012     

A group of law experts, including law professors, lawyers and journalists, looked at the upcoming docket for the Supreme Court, which begins its term in October.

Conversation with Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan
Thursday, September 20, 2012     

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan traveled to the University of Richmond and addressed an audience of law students during a conversation with Law School Dean Wendy Perdue.

Share This Event Via Social Media

Audio Playlist

  • Supreme Court Oral Argument

Photo Gallery

C-SPAN Gifts (late 2012)
Questions? Comments? Email us at AmericanHistoryTV@c-span.org