C-SPAN.ORG
   WATCH / LISTEN
Campaign 2008
110th Congress
Bush Administration
Supreme Court
Energy
Iraq
Response to Terrorism
  C-SPAN SERIES
America & the Courts
American Perspectives
Booknotes
Book TV | Schedule
The Communicators
Newsmakers
Prime Minister's Questions
Q&A
Road to the White House
Washington Journal
  C-SPAN RADIO >>
Radio | Schedule
American Political Archive
LBJ White House Tapes
  OTHER C-SPAN SITES
American Presidents
American Writers
Book TV
Booknotes
C-SPAN Classroom
Campaign 2008 Bus
C-SPAN Video Library
The Capitol
Capitol Hearings
Lincoln 200 Years
Must Carry
Politics
Presidential Libraries
Q&A
Students & Leaders
Tocqueville
  NEED HELP?
Download RealPlayer
Download Windows Player
Problems With Video?
C-SPAN Copyright Policy
Contact Us


 C-SPAN > C-SPAN in the Classroom > Campaign Clip of the Day > Sept. 29, 2004                                                                           

Wednesday, September 29, 2004
Watch clip
(7 min) Watch entire program  (48 min)
 Tucson Citizen    Columbia Daily Tribune (MO)
Back to Clip Index

Walter Dellinger, Former Acting Solicitor General for the Clinton Administration (1996-1997) and Theodore Olson, Former Solicitor General for the Bush Administration (2001-2004), discuss the potential impact of the 2004 election on the makeup of the Supreme Court. In this clip, the two men look at trends in past presidential appointments to the Court and predict what the next four years could hold for the Supreme Court bench. The clip starts at 0:06 and ends at 7:20.


From Classroom Teachers   | General ideas for using clips
  • Campaign specific   What is the job of Supreme Court justices? How are justices selected? How long are their terms? Theodore Olson suggests appointments to the US Supreme Court are not a concern for President Bush in this election. Do you find this credible? What are John Kerry's viewpoints about potential Supreme Court nominations? To be an informed voter, is it important to know each candidate's thoughts and plans for the Supreme Court? Should we press for more candid statements from the candidates?
  • Media literacy  Why is it important to have persons of equal position representing each party in this interview? While the gentlemen seem to be in agreement, are there differences in their opinions? How does the fact that they are lawyers as opposed to political party representatives add to the credibility of the interview? 
  • More ideas    Watch the entire program and identify some of the issues the Court will face this term. How might the outcome affect your life or the country. Consider, again, why there has been little discussion by the candidates about U.S. Supreme Court appointments. OR Discuss the process of Court appointments, confirmations and term lengths for Supreme Court justices. Would you change the way in which one becomes a Supreme Court justice, or how long one may remain on the Supreme Court?