Were Congressional vacations always as long and held as often as they are now? Lexington,
KY - 7/31/00
No. The pattern of Congressional sessions and breaks has changed over the years. In general,
earlier Congresses spent fewer months in session per year, with few, and sometimes no breaks.
More recent Congresses have spent virtually the entire year in legislative session, but have
combined the longer session with longer and more frequent breaks. These breaks are not labeled
by Congress as vacations, but as either "recesses" or "district work periods." The change in
terminology was deliberate, to let the electorate know that work continues during these breaks, it
just changes location from Washington, D.C. to the local area.
For example, a recent Washington Post article (8/21/97) profiled then-Rep. Bill Paxon (R-NY). The
reporter accompanying Paxon noted his schedule for one weekend during the August recess. It
consisted of four town meetings, a fund-raising breakfast, a ceremony for the U.S. tae kown do
team, a lunch with local officials, a visit to an optics plant, a YMCA visit, a speech to 650 county
Republicans, and an appearance at the county fair.
During the last decade, from the 100th-105th Congress, legislators averaged 312 days in
legislative session per two-year Congress, spread over an average of months, and
interrupted by extended breaks spent back in their districts and states. They spent
about days in recess per Congress.
The pattern that we have today began in about 1943 with the 78th Congress. That
Congress spent 22 months in legislative session over its two-year lifespan, for a
total of days, and spent about 175 days out of Washington in recess.
Prior to the 78th, Congress took breaks only over the Christmas and New Year's holidays, with a
few exceptions. The tradition of a regular Christmas break began only with the 35th Congress in
1857. And prior to the 35th, Christmas breaks were held inconsistently. From the 1st Congress
to the 15th, no breaks were taken, with two brief exceptions.
However, during those first 15 Congresses, annual sessions averaged 5 months in length, in
contrast to the current average of 11 months per year. The distance, difficulty, and time involved
in travel to the Capitol dictated shorter legislative sessions in those earlier Congresses.
Given this data, it would be difficult to make the case that Congress is working less -- but it is
working differently. Our modern legislators have full-time jobs whereas earlier Members went
home to take up their original occupation again for a few months, leaving behind all legislative
responsibilities. Modern legislators have thousands more constituents than their predecessors,
and they hear from them in some form, or receive visits from them, every day of the year. The
development of modern travel and rapid communications technology has meant a steady increase
in the amount of visits, communications and correspondence. Most legislators today spend
scheduled recesses traveling their districts and states and holding meetings and open office hours
in their local offices. A few Members use some recess time to travel abroad with official
delegations to meet their counterparts in foreign nations. To see what trips your Member might have taken
recently, visit the Congressional Travel Database.
Personal time off differs among Members. You would have to contact your own Member or
Senator and ask how much of any given congressional recess they spent on an actual vacation.