Videos

Georgetown University Law Center previewed the 2020-21 Supreme Court term. One of the biggest cases set to be heard by the justices was one challenging the constitutionality of the Affordabl…

The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following Supreme Court oral argument in Chiafalo v. Washington and Colorado Department of State v. Baca. The two cases concern wheth…

The Washington Council of Lawyers hosted a panel discussion with journalists to review the 2018-19 Supreme Court term. Among the speakers were Los Angeles Times Supreme Court Correspondent D…

The Supreme Court heard oral argument for Husted v. Randolph Institute. The case concerns whether Ohio’s voter purge policy violates the federal laws of the National Voter Registration Act a…

Midway through the 2017-18 Supreme Court term, attorneys and Court watchers talked about some of the key remaining oral arguments the justices would hear. These included a case on congressio…

The Supreme Court heard oral argument for Gill v. Whitford, a case involving redistricting in Wisconsin. A lower court in 2016 ruled that the state’s 2011 map drafted by the Republican contr…

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, docket number 14-232. The case concerns whether Arizona’s legislative districts violate …

Constitutional and appellate law attorneys previewed cases and petitions for the Supreme Court 2015-2016 term. Topics included redistricting (Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm…

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in the consolidated cases of Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, and National Mining Association. v. EPA. …

Constitutional attorneys previewed the same-sex marriage cases the Supreme Court was scheduled to address the following week. Those cases involved whether the 14th Amendment requires states …

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Klayman v. Obama about the constitutionality of the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of telephone and Internet metadata. …

Constitutional law attorneys reviewed the 2013-14 Supreme Court term. Topics included campaign finance, cell phone searches, and presidential recess appointment powers. The American Constitu…

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Harris v. Quinn, docket number 11-681, about whether a state may, consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Const…

Legal scholars previewed the two same-sex marriage cases to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on March 26 and 27, 2013. Hollingsworth v. Perry concerned California’s Proposition 8 law,…

Justices heard oral arguments in the case Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants, docket number 08-1448, which focused on the state’s ability to restrict the sale of violent video games a…

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the cases of Crawford v. Marion County Election Board and Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita about the validity of the law passed in 2005 by the…

The Bill of Rights Institute and William and Mary Law School hosted a moot court on the FCC v. Fox Television indecency case. The case rests on the FCC’s ban against the use of curse words i…

Indiana Solicitor General Tom Fisher and Paul Smith, the attorney representing the Indiana Democratic Party, talked about the U.S. Supreme Court case Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita. They…

Participants spoke to reporters on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court following oral arguments in the case of Crawford v. Marion County Election Board and Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita…

A moot court on “Guantanamo Detainees and the Military Commissions Act” was held in the McGlothlin Court Room as part of the College of William and Mary School of Law 20th Annual Supreme Cou…