Debate on Confidentiality of Sources

A debate was held on the question: “Should the Law Protect Reporters from Having to Disclose Confidential Sources?” Speaking… read more

A debate was held on the question: “Should the Law Protect Reporters from Having to Disclose Confidential Sources?” Speaking for the affirmative: Judith Miller, a New York Times reporter involved in the Wilson/Plame investigation; Robert Bertsche; and David Rini. Speaking for the negative: former U.S. Attorney Joseph DiGenova; former Deputy Asst. U.S. Attorney General Victoria Toensing; and Nick Barber. The affirmative position was declared the winner by audience vote. close

Javascript must be enabled in order to access C-SPAN videos.

*The transcript for this program was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

People in this video

More People

Hosting Organization

More information about

Debate on Confidentiality of Sources

103 Views
Program ID:
184309-1
Category:
Public Affairs Event
Format:
Debate
Location:
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
First Aired:
Nov 26, 2004
Last Aired:
Jul 10, 2005

Airing Details

  • Nov 26, 2004 | 7:59pm EST | C-SPAN 1
  • Nov 26, 2004 | 11:51pm EST | C-SPAN 1
  • Nov 27, 2004 | 5:12am EST | C-SPAN 1
  • Nov 28, 2004 | 10:05am EST | C-SPAN 1
  • Nov 29, 2004 | 1:29pm EST | C-SPAN 3
  • Dec 02, 2004 | 3:39pm EST | C-SPAN 3
  • Jul 09, 2005 | 9:22pm EDT | C-SPAN 1
  • Jul 10, 2005 | 12:30am EDT | C-SPAN 1
Purchase a DVD or Download

Debate on Confidentiality of Sources

  • DVD
    Length:
    01:44:38
    Price:
    $24.95
    Add to Cart
  • MP3 audio
    Length:
    01:44:38
    Price:
    $0.99
    Add to Cart

Clips from This Video