Santiago v. Rumsfeld
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a… read more
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the “stop loss” order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract.
After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit’s three-judge panel affirmed the lower court’s decision in favor of the government’s argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago’s deployment to Afghanistan.
The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law. close
*The transcript for this program was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.
People in this video
- Byron, H. Thomas Attorney Department of Defense
- Canby, William C. Jr. Senior Judge U.S. Court of Appeals->Ninth Circuit
- Goldberg, Steven Attorney
- Rawlinson, Johnnie B. Judge U.S. Court of Appeals->Ninth Circuit
- Tallman, Richard Judge U.S. Court of Appeals->Ninth Circuit
Padilla v. Lever Oral Arguments
The full panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Padilla v. Lever over allegations that…
Nadarajah v. Gonzales Oral Arguments
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Nadarajah v. Gonzales to decide whether the government could…
Canyon County, Idaho v. Sygenta Seeds Oral Argument
The Ninth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Canyon County, Idaho v. Sygenta Seeds.
Nurre v. Whitehead Oral Argument
Oral arguments were heard in the Nurre v. Whitehead, a case challenging a school’s decision to forbid band…