| Part Of Washington Journal
Washington Journal
Report Video IssueWashington Journal
Supreme Court Argument on Campaign Finance
2009-09-04T09:21:20-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNTUxXC8yODg3MjUtMDktbS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==Adam Liptak talked about the upcoming Supreme Court oral argument, scheduled for the following Wednesday, on whether the court should overrule a 1990 decision, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. This case arose from a political documentary called Hillary: The Movie. The film’s producers lost a Federal Election Commission and lower court decision that prohibited them from distributing it on a video-on-demand service on grounds that it violated a McCain-Feingold ban on corporate money being used for electioneering.
Adam Liptak talked about the upcoming Supreme Court oral argument, scheduled for the following Wednesday, on whether the court should overru…
read more
Adam Liptak talked about the upcoming Supreme Court oral argument, scheduled for the following Wednesday, on whether the court should overrule a 1990 decision, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. This case arose from a political documentary called Hillary: The Movie. The film’s producers lost a Federal Election Commission and lower court decision that prohibited them from distributing it on a video-on-demand service on grounds that it violated a McCain-Feingold ban on corporate money being used for electioneering. close
Adam Liptak talked about the upcoming Supreme Court oral argument, scheduled for the following Wednesday, on whether the court should overru… read more
Adam Liptak talked about the upcoming Supreme Court oral argument, scheduled for the following Wednesday, on whether the court should overrule a 1990 decision, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. This case arose from a political documentary called Hillary: The Movie. The film’s producers lost a Federal Election Commission and lower court decision that prohibited them from distributing it on a video-on-demand service on grounds that it violated a McCain-Feingold ban on corporate money being used for electioneering. close
People in this video
Hosting Organization
Series
More Videos From
Washington Journal
- Aftermath of Recessions
- Political News Review
- Open Phones
- Afghanistan Operations
- Political News Review
- Supreme Court Argument on Campaign Finance
Purchase a Download
Supreme Court Argument on Campaign Finance
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $4.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Open Phones, Part 1
Telephone lines were open for comments on the question, “Is it time for public campaign financing?”
-
New Term for Supreme Court
Adam Liptak previewed the most anticipated cases of the Supreme Court’s new term and responded to telephone calls and el…
-
New Supreme Court Term
Adam Liptak previewed the Supreme Court’s 2010-2011 session. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communi…
-
Outside Groups and Campaign 2010
Steven Law of American Crossroads talked about his organization’s efforts to elect Republicans in the 2010 midterm elect…