U.S. Sentencing Commission Plan
This is a panel discussion of the Basic Plan of the U.S. Sentencing Commission. The plan, which was adopted by Congress in November 1987, es… read more
This is a panel discussion of the Basic Plan of the U.S. Sentencing Commission. The plan, which was adopted by Congress in November 1987, establishes guidelines for all federal offenses. Hence, what is at issue in the debate is the tension between equality and discretion in sentencing felons. Both Breyer and Nagel are for the plan, arguing that it creates consistency in sentencing. Nagel especially finds such consistency beneficial as it helps to eliminate those instances where sentencing was affected by race, sex, or class. MacCarthy, on the other hand, opposes the plan for two reasons. First, he argues that it will eliminate the discretion of trial judges leaving us with “sentencing by robotics.” Secondly, he argues that such “judicial legislation” violates the separation of powers. close
People in this video
- Terence MacCarthy Chairman American Bar Association->Criminal Justice
- Ilene Nagel Chairman and CEO U.S. Sentencing Commission
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
Supreme Court
Linda McElroy, the Supreme Court tour director conducts a visual tour of the Supreme Court Building while discussing the…
-
Senate Session
The Senate passed H.R. 2978, to amend section 700 of title 18, United States Code, to protect the physical integrity of …
-
Good Cops: The Case for Preventive Policing
David Harris talked about his book "Good Cops: The Case for Preventive Policing". In it Mr. Harris called for an end to …
-
International Law Sources
The panelists discussed the use of foreign and international law sources in domestic constitutional interpretation. They…