Bell Ringers

Bell Ringer: Affirmative Action and College Admissions

Lee Bollinger Discusses the Benefits and Drawbacks of Affirmative Action in the College Admission Process

As the former President of the University of Michigan, Lee Bollinger was the respondent in the Supreme Court case Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). In this clip, he discusses affirmative action policies within the college admission process.

Description

Affirmative action policies are designed to remedy past discrimination. Colleges and universities have used affirmative action policies in their admissions process to increase diversity at their institutions. In California v. Bakke (1978) the Supreme Court ruled that using quotas in the admissions process was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) that in the interest of obtaining educational benefits from a diverse student body, colleges and universities can use race as one of the factors in evaluating applicants. As the former President of the University of Michigan, Lee Bollinger was the respondent in the Supreme Court case Grutter v. Bollinger. In this clip, he discusses affirmative action policies within the college admission process.

Bell Ringer Assignment

  • What does Lee Bollinger mean by "remedying purpose of past discrimination?" Why does Bollinger believe that it is necessary to view affirmative action within a historical context?
  • What benefits does Lee Bollinger provide in support for affirmative action policies in the college admission process?
  • What arguments against affirmative action does Bollinger provide?
  • What other examples of beneficiaries of affirmative action does Bollinger include?

Additional Resources

Participants

Vocabulary

  • Affirmative Action
  • California V. Bakke
  • Diversity
  • Grutter V. Bollinger
  • Quota
  • Supreme Court

Topics

AP U.S. Government Key TermsCivil Rights & Civil LibertiesJudicial Branch

Grades

High SchoolUniversity