Bell Ringers
sunshinecavalluzzi Thumbnail
User-Created Content
By sunshinecavalluzzi
On February 18, 2019

Bell Ringer: Unprotected Speech: Obscenity

Roth v. United States: Overruling the Victorian-Era Test Previously Used to Evaluate Obscenity

Robert Corn-Revere, a partner of the Davis Wright Tremaine law firm, discusses the standard set for obscene speech in the 1957 Roth v. United States Supreme Court case and the positions of the various SCOTUS justices of the time on what constituted obscenity, as articulated in Roth and subsequent cases

Description

Obscene content falls in the category of speech unprotected by First Amendment guarantees. Over the 20th century, content from The Grapes of Wrath to hip hop music has been punished as obscene by various state and local authorities, and the Supreme Court has been asked repeatedly to evaluate it. In the 1957 Roth v. United States case, the SCOTUS established that test of obscenity was to determine "whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to prurient interest." In 1972, the Court modified this test in their Miller v. California ruling, determining that in addition to the Roth question, evaluators must ask whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value." Offensive content that appears in television or radio broadcasts can be regulated by the Federal Communications Commission under their indecency guidelines even if it it not considered obscene.

Bell Ringer Assignment

  • What, according to Robert Corn-Revere, was the Hicklin test? How did the Supreme Court's decision in Roth v. United States depart from that test? Were the Supreme Court justices of that time united in their positions on obscenity?
  • How did the two 1990s First Amendment cases involving hip-hop artists 2 Live Crew, according to Luther Campbell, impact the music we heard today? Why was he involved in the obscenity cases despite his contention that the lyrics he wrote were not graphic?
  • AP Government - Questions to Consider: How do endeavors to ban or punish speech considered obscene reflect authoritarian versus libertarian political philosophies? How do they reflect the balancing act between civil liberties and police powers?

Additional Resources

Participants

    Vocabulary

    • 1st Amendment
    • Constitution
    • Free Speech
    • Indecency
    • Miller Test
    • Miller V. California
    • Obscenity
    • Roth V. United States
    • Supreme Court

    Topics

    AP U.S. Government Key TermsCivil Rights & Civil LibertiesSupreme Court Cases

    Grades

    High School