Deliberations over the role of religion in public life are as old as the United States itself - and, of course, a significant part of the causation of there being a United States at all! In numerous cases, the Supreme Court has examined the question of if and how religion can be integrated into public schools and established parameters for that inclusion. One of those landmark decisions was the 1962 case of Engel v. Vitale, involving a challenge to the daily formal recitation of the "Regents Prayer" by New York school children.
Opening Response/Discussion:
In 1951, the New York State of Regents required that its school begin each day with classroom recitations of the following prayer: “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our Country.”
The teacher-led prayer was recited alongside the Pledge of Allegiance and conducted with students' heads bowed and palms pressed together. Student participation was voluntary.
In your view, does this set of circumstances constitute a law "respecting an establishment of religion," as prohibited by the First Amendment? Why or why not? What are a few arguments that might be made by someone taking the opposing position?
Fact-Finding:
Watch the Engel and Abington: The SCOTUS and School Prayer video clip and respond to the below questions:
Fact-Finding:
Watch the SCOTUS Rationale for its Engel and Abington Decisions video clip and respond to the below questions:
Fact-Finding:
Watch the Aftermath of the Engel and Abington Decisions video clip and respond to the below questions:
Fact-Finding:
Watch the SCOTUS Rationale for its Engel and Abington Decisions video clip and respond to the below questions:
Fact-Finding:
Watch the Two Kinds of Ways Religious Activities Can Take Place on Campuses video clip and respond to the below questions:
Fact-Finding:
Watch the Organized Prayer in Public Schools video clip and respond to the below questions:
Fact-Finding:
Read and annotate the Engel v. Vitale case overview and opinion excerpts.
Evaluation:
Revisit what you wrote in your opening response and rewrite it to incorporate facts and arguments presented in the video clips and case information.
The Engel v. Vitale decision is now more than 50 years old. In your view, does it still make sense today? Why or why not?
Extension Activity Options
Respond to the writing prompt, presented in the style of the SCOTUS Comparison Question component of the redesigned AP Government and Politics exam.