This lesson provides students with an opportunity to review the facts and holdings of, and connections between, the fourteen landmark Supreme Court cases selected for inclusion in the redesigned AP Government course (see list below). While the case selection is aligned with the Advanced Placement course, these landmark cases are suitable for use in any government course focusing on key Supreme Court decisions in United States legal history. Landmark Cases: Marbury v. Madision (1803); McCulloch v. Maryland (1819); Schenck v. United States (1919); Brown v. Board of Education (1954); Baker v. Carr (1961); Engel v. Vitale (1962); Gideon v. Wainwright (1963); Tinker v. Des Moines (1969); New York Times v. United States (1971); Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972); Shaw v. Reno (1993); United States v. Lopez (1995); Citizens United v. FEC (2010); McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
Forming Knowledge:
Students, working either individually or in jigsawed groups, peruse the following short video clips, as well as their textbook, class notes, and any other teacher-provided resources, to fact-find about each of the fourteen Key SCOTUS Cases from the redesigned AP Government exam, sharing and comparing information with one another.
Video Clip One: Marbury v. Madison - 1803
Video Clip Two: McCulloch v. Maryland - 1819
Video Clip Three: Schenck v. United States -1919
Video Clip Four: Brown v. Board of Education - 1954
Video Clip Five: Baker v. Carr - 1961
Video Clip Six: Engel v. Vitale - 1962
Video Clip Seven: Gideon v. Wainwright - 1963
Video Clip Eight: Tinker v. Des Moines - 1969
Video Clip Nine: New York Times v. U.S. - 1971
Video Clip Ten: Wisconsin v. Yoder - 1972
Video Clip Eleven: Shaw v. Reno - 1993
Video Clip Twelve: U.S. v. Lopez - 1995
Enhancing Knowledge & Connections:
Students complete the Key Supreme Court Cases Overview Chart, using the video clips above and/or the more extensive lesson plans hyperlinked within the chart, to extend and enhance their understanding of each case and the connections between cases.
Reviewing Knowledge:
Using the Key SCOTUS Cases Game Cards, students play any of the below games as directed, or a variation of your class's creation, in small groups (sized as works best for your particular classroom).
NOTE: In order to enhance game play, the game cards contain a few cases in addition to those in the College Board's list of 14. As you wish, you can keep those extra cards, discard them, or replace them with cases of your selection. Each set of directions is repeated twice on the first sheet to facilitate creation of class sets of game cards. There are also five variations for review card gameplay in the C-SPAN AP Government Key Founding Documents Review lesson that can be adapted for these document cards!
Variation One:
Variation Two:
Variation Three:
Variation Four:
Variation Five:
Reviewing Knowledge Virtually:
The Key SCOTUS Cases VIRTUAL REVIEW Game Cards were designed as variations to the above games that could be printed out individually in student homes and played virtually, on their own initiative or as directed/facilitated by you, using a virtual collaboration platform like Zoom or FaceTime.
There are also five variations for virtual review card gameplay in the C-SPAN AP Government Key Founding Documents Review lesson that can be adapted for these case cards!
Virtual Variation One
Virtual Variation Two
Virtual Variation Three
Virtual Variation Four
Virtual Variation Five
Extending Knowledge:
Students engage in one or more of the below activities, either working individually or in groups, to reflect their understanding of the cases.
MIND MAP IT: Create a mind map or similar infographic detailing the key facts of your selected case and key provisions of the ruling.
AMI-CRUSHING IT: For your selected case, determine two groups that might reasonably have filed amicus briefs supporting each side. Write a short explanation for each of the four indicating why you feel they would have been on that side, what you believe the gist of their argument would have been, and a hashtag they might have used to try to build social media support for their position..
MEANING IN THE MEME-ING: Create two memes for your selected case that convey main ideas, along with two opportune hashtags that for each might be used when posting that meme on social media.
CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT: Choose a famous person whom, in your view, would be an active proponent of the ideas/ruling in your selected case because of the way those the case might apply to his/her life. Print a picture of your celebrity with a thought bubble indicating and explaining your rationale.
PRESS PLAY: Create either a Netflix queue or a song playlist to accompany your selected case. Your list should have 6-8 entries, each an actual film/TV show or song (depending on which option you choose) that, in your view, connects to a significant theme or component of your case, accompanied by an explanation of that connection.
Communicating Knowledge:
Students respond to:
Kahoot!ing Knowledge
This 35-question Kahoot contains excerpts from each of the 14 key SCOTUS cases and 9 founding documents for students to identify. It can be played in class, over Zoom via a shared screen, or independently by students.
Blooketing Knowledge
This 36-question Blooket contains excerpts from each of the 14 key SCOTUS cases and 9 founding documents for students to identify. It can be played in class, over Zoom, or independently by students.
Blooketing More Knowledge
This 34-question Blooket reviews a series of landmark SCOTUS cases, including the 14 key AP Gov cases.
Quizleting Knowledge
This Quizlet set contains excerpts from each of the 14 key SCOTUS cases and 9 founding documents for students to use as flashcards or for Quizlet gameplay.
Respond to the writing prompt, presented in the style of the SCOTUS Comparison Question component of the redesigned AP Government and Politics exam.
Respond to the writing prompt, presented in the style of the SCOTUS Comparison Question component of the redesigned AP Government and Politics exam.
Respond to the writing prompt, presented in the style of the SCOTUS Comparison Question component of the redesigned AP Government and Politics exam.