Washington Journal
Open Phones
2014-06-30T07:00:00-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvZWNlXC8yMDE0MDYzMDA3MDczOTAwMV9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the Supreme Court’s expected ruling later in the morning in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, combined with the case of Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation. The cases involved the provision of the Affordable Care Act that mandates contraception coverage, and whether for-profit corporations can deny employees that coverage based on the religious beliefs of its owners.
Kimberly Robinson reviewed the Supreme Court decisions for the 2013-14 term that had not yet been announced.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores was formerly referred to as Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores. The name of the case was changed following the resignation of former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the Supreme Court’s expected ruling later in the morning in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, …
read more
Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the Supreme Court’s expected ruling later in the morning in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, combined with the case of Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation. The cases involved the provision of the Affordable Care Act that mandates contraception coverage, and whether for-profit corporations can deny employees that coverage based on the religious beliefs of its owners.
Kimberly Robinson reviewed the Supreme Court decisions for the 2013-14 term that had not yet been announced.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores was formerly referred to as Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores. The name of the case was changed following the resignation of former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. close
Kimberly Robinson reviewed the Supreme Court decisions for the 2013-14 term that had not yet been announced.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores was formerly referred to as Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores. The name of the case was changed following the resignation of former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the Supreme Court’s expected ruling later in the morning in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, … read more
Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the Supreme Court’s expected ruling later in the morning in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, combined with the case of Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation. The cases involved the provision of the Affordable Care Act that mandates contraception coverage, and whether for-profit corporations can deny employees that coverage based on the religious beliefs of its owners.
Kimberly Robinson reviewed the Supreme Court decisions for the 2013-14 term that had not yet been announced.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores was formerly referred to as Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores. The name of the case was changed following the resignation of former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. close
People in this video
Hosting Organization
Series
More Videos From This Event
- U.S. Options in Iraq
- Affordable Care Act and Health Insurance Costs
- Bipartisan Proposal for Partisan Gridlock
Related Video
-
Preview of Supreme Court Hobby Lobby Decision
Kimberly Robinson of Bloomberg BNA previewed the Supreme Court expected decision later in the morning in the high-profil…
-
Open Phones on Supreme Court Contraceptive Mandate Ruling
Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. …
-
Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Commentary, Part 1
Mike Doyle talked about background of the case Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, a U.S. Supreme Court case about the provi…
-
Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Commentary, Part 2
Mike Doyle talked about the outcome and long-term effects of the case Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, a U.S. Supreme Cou…