Nielsen v. Preap Oral Argument
2018-10-12T20:04:12-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNWUyXC8yMDE4MTAxMjIwMDQ1MzAwMl9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Nielsen v. Preap, an immigration law case that challenges a federal provision requiring mandatory and immediate detention of non-citizens who have been convicted of a crime after they have served their sentences. The plaintiffs, Mr. Mony Preap and others represented by the ACLU, were arrested and detained by immigration officers years after already serving time for their crimes. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the group. The Trump administration disagreed with the ruling, arguing it would harm it efforts to deport convicted aliens quickly.
The Court ruled 5-4 on March 19, 2019, that the Homeland Security Department can detain certain non-citizens with a criminal history after they have served their sentences and been released for several years.
The Court ruled 5-4 on March 19, 2019, that the Homeland Security Department can detain certain non-citizens with a criminal history after they have served their sentences and been released for several years.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Nielsen v. Preap, an immigration law case that challenges a federal provision requiring mandatory a… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Nielsen v. Preap, an immigration law case that challenges a federal provision requiring mandatory and immediate detention of non-citizens who have been convicted of a crime after they have served their sentences. The plaintiffs, Mr. Mony Preap and others represented by the ACLU, were arrested and detained by immigration officers years after already serving time for their crimes. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the group. The Trump administration disagreed with the ruling, arguing it would harm it efforts to deport convicted aliens quickly.
The Court ruled 5-4 on March 19, 2019, that the Homeland Security Department can detain certain non-citizens with a criminal history after they have served their sentences and been released for several years. close
People in this video
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Nielsen v. Preap Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Madison v. Alabama Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Madison v. Alabama, which concerns the fate of a 67-year old inmate in Alabama …
-
Garza v. Idaho Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Garza v. Idaho, a case concerning the appeal rights of defendants after enterin…
-
Frank v. Gaos Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument for Frank v. Gaos, concerning the distribution of the monetary awards from class a…
-
Merck Sharp and Dohme Corporation v. Albrecht Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht, concerning whether drug manufacturer c…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 2 minutes
- 16 views
-
- 1 minute
- 12 views