Review of Supreme Court Oral Argument in McGirt v. Oklahoma
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following Supreme Court oral argument in McGirt v. Oklahoma. The case focuses on st… read more
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following Supreme Court oral argument in McGirt v. Oklahoma. The case focuses on states versus federal criminal jurisdiction on Indian lands. Lindsay Robertson, the faculty director of University of Oklahoma’s Center for the Study of American Indian Law and Policy, and environmental attorney Robert Cheren took part in the discussion moderated by the National Constitution Center’s Jeffrey Rosen. close
People in this video
- Robert Cheren Attorney
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
McGirt v. Oklahoma Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference in McGirt v. Oklahoma, a case concerning state versus federal c…
-
Review of Supreme Court Oral Argument on Discrimination Lawsuits Against Religious Employers
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following the Supreme Court consolidated oral argument in Our L…
-
Review of Supreme Court Oral Argument in Subpoena of President Trump's Tax Returns
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following Supreme Court oral arguments in a number of cases dea…
-
Review of Supreme Court Oral Argument in Birth Control Mandate Case
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following the Supreme Court oral argument in Little Sisters of …