User Clip: Justice Kennedy discusses Gridlock and the Supreme Court
Justice Kennedy discusses Gridlock and the Supreme Court
- 2 minutes
- 2,791 views
Justice Kennedy discusses Gridlock and the Supreme Court
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer testify on imprisonment, solitary confinement, and mandatory minimum penalties in the United States.
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer testified on the Supreme Court fiscal year 2016 budget and the federal judiciary system. . . .Topics included . . .cameras in the court room. . .…
In response to a question submitted by Fix the Court, Justice Anthony Kennedy offers a less-than-convincing reason as to why the Supreme Court is not more open about its potential conflicts…
Justice Kennedy explains the relationship between Gridlock and the Supreme Court.
"This idea of total incarceration isn't working, and it's not humane," Justice Kennedy said. He went on to say that he felt not enough study, thought, and investigative resources were…
Stark contrast to what Chief Justice Roberts said in April 2017
Justice Anthony Kennedy mentions costs savings during testimony on the Supreme Court fiscal year 2016 budget and the federal judiciary system.
Justice Breyer's intrdution speech to House Approriations Subcommittee on Fiancial Serves and General Government
Justice Breyer talks about why there is a high bar for recusal in the U.S. Supreme Court.
From March 2015 testimony before House Committee
Justice Kennedy discusses details of the Supreme Court budget before a congressional committee.
Justice Breyer proposes explaining landmark cases via tv series
Justice Breyer and Justice Kennedy comment on the efforts of the Supreme Court to encourage and empower citizens' ability to engage with the Supreme Court.
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer testify at the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government Hearing held on March 23, 2015.
Kennedy speaking to committee on SC budget request--intro remarks
The justices share their thoughts on why the Supreme Court is hearing fewer cases than it did the past.