Bork Nomination Day 8, Part 2
Professor Leuchtenburg, a historian, stated that the Constitution should be viewed as a “living legacy” and that Judge Bork’s philosophy of original intent is against expanded freedom. Professor Dellinger followed up by associating Bork with Attorney General Edwin Meese in “attacking the Fourteenth Amendment under the guise of original intent.”
Three law professors testified against the nomination. Professor Franklin related personal experiences with segregation and suggested that Judge Bork, had he been on the Supreme… read more
Three law professors testified against the nomination. Professor Franklin related personal experiences with segregation and suggested that Judge Bork, had he been on the Supreme Court at the time, would not have had the “vision and the courage” to strike down segregationist laws.
Professor Leuchtenburg, a historian, stated that the Constitution should be viewed as a “living legacy” and that Judge Bork’s philosophy of original intent is against expanded freedom. Professor Dellinger followed up by associating Bork with Attorney General Edwin Meese in “attacking the Fourteenth Amendment under the guise of original intent.” close
Related Video
-
Bork Nomination Day 6, Part 2
Among the former attorneys general to testify, Mr. Katzenbach expresses opposition to the Bork nomination. Of those supporting Judge…
-
Bork Nomination Day 6, Part 1
The committee opens the second week of hearings with four civil rights leaders testifying against the nomination of Judge Bork. Mr. Coleman expresses…
-
Bork Nomination Day 4, Part 1
The morning session continues with seven senators taking thirty minutes each to question Judge Bork. Of note is Senator Kennedy’s…
-
Bork Nomination Day 10, Part 1
Senator Eagleton and Professor Sunstein expressed opposition to the nomination. They criticized Judge Bork’s view of separation of powers…