Bork Nomination Day 9, Part 5
The panel of law professors expressed opposition to the nomination. Professor Fiss called Bork’s judicial philosophy -majoritarianism- because of its… read more
The panel of law professors expressed opposition to the nomination. Professor Fiss called Bork’s judicial philosophy -majoritarianism- because of its de-emphasis of individual liberties. Professor Grey addressed five Bork myths arising from the confirmation hearings. He concluded that Bork’s academic writing could not be separated from his probable actions as a Supreme Court justice, that Bork’s views have not changed, and that they were not tentative. Professor Resnik looked at Bork’s character as an appeals court judge and found it lacking. close
Related Video
-
Bork Nomination Day 10, Part 1
Senator Eagleton and Professor Sunstein expressed opposition to the nomination. They criticized Judge Bork’s view of separation of powers…
-
Bork Nomination Day 10, Part 2
The former attorney general testified in support of the nomination. Mr. Bell maintained that Judge Bork’s judicial philosophy and…
-
Bork Nomination Day 11, Part 2
Former Attorney General Elliot Richardson testified in support of Robert Bork’s Supreme Court confirmation. In October 1973 Richardson resigned…
-
Bork Nomination Day 11, Part 4
Two former Watergate prosecuters testified concerning the role of Judge Bork in the firing of Archibald Cox and its…