Miranda Laws: Minnick v. Mississippi

Constitutional law professor William Greenhalgh talked about the Supreme Court case Minnick v. Mississippi and compared and contrasted it… read more

Constitutional law professor William Greenhalgh talked about the Supreme Court case Minnick v. Mississippi and compared and contrasted it to Edwards v. Arizona of 1981. Both cases deal with the Miranda rights of defendants. Dr. Greenhalgh explained that in the Minnick case, the Court decided no interrogation can take place without the presence of counsel unless the accused expressly waives that right. He cited that Minnick differed from Edwards because in Edwards that protection ended as soon as an attorney is provided. close

Report Video Issue

People in this video

Hosting Organization

More information about

Miranda Laws: Minnick v. Mississippi

174 Views
Program ID:
15287-1
Category:
Interview
Format:
Interview
Location:
No Location
First Aired:
Dec 07, 1990 | 10:35am EST | C-SPAN 1
Last Aired:
Dec 10, 1990 | 2:00am EST | C-SPAN 1

Airing Details

  • Dec 07, 1990 | 10:35am EST | C-SPAN 1
  • Dec 07, 1990 | 2:15pm EST | C-SPAN 1
  • Dec 08, 1990 | 7:03pm EST | C-SPAN 1
  • Dec 08, 1990 | 11:19pm EST | C-SPAN 2
  • Dec 09, 1990 | 6:10am EST | C-SPAN 2
  • Dec 10, 1990 | 2:00am EST | C-SPAN 1
Purchase a Download

Miranda Laws: Minnick v. Mississippi

  • MP3 audio - Standard
    Price:
    $0.99