Nude Dancing: Barnes v. Glen Theatre
The interviews focused on the case of Barnes v. Glen Theatre, arguing whether nude dancing is a form of conduct, or a form of expression pro… read more
The interviews focused on the case of Barnes v. Glen Theatre, arguing whether nude dancing is a form of conduct, or a form of expression protected by the First Amendment. Both sides agree that the question is not one of obscenity, which is defined as an offensive depiction of sexual conduct. Wayne Uhl, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, answered questions about the state’s case, arguing that the issue is broader than nude dancing; it includes the state’s authority to ban all types of public nudity. Mr. Uhl said it is important to protect family values, which are “based on sexual modesty, not public promiscuity.” He explained that the state defines nude dancing as conduct, not speech, meaning it lacks protection under the First Amendment. Bruce Ennis, attorney for the Glen Theatre, said, "As long as the activity is an expressive activity, and as long as it does not meet the other standards for banning obscene activity, and the State has conceded that this is not obscene. close
People in this video
- Rebecca Robertson Dancer
- Wayne Uhl Deputy Attorney General Indiana
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
Supreme Court Decision on Flag Burning
Representative David Skaggs (D-Colorado) discussed the possibility of a constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration…
-
Religion in the Classroom
Religious Broadcaster Pat Robertson delivered the keynote address, discussing the role of religion in schools. His remar…
-
Speechless
Bruce Barry talked about his book Speechless: The Erosion of Free Expression in the American Workplace, published by Ber…
-
FCC v. Fox Television Reactions
Carter Phillips, the attorney representing Fox Television, spoke to the press after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral ar…