Nude Dancing: Barnes v. Glen Theatre

The interviews focused on the case of Barnes v. Glen Theatre, arguing whether nude dancing is a form of conduct, or a form of expression pro… read more

The interviews focused on the case of Barnes v. Glen Theatre, arguing whether nude dancing is a form of conduct, or a form of expression protected by the First Amendment. Both sides agree that the question is not one of obscenity, which is defined as an offensive depiction of sexual conduct. Wayne Uhl, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, answered questions about the state’s case, arguing that the issue is broader than nude dancing; it includes the state’s authority to ban all types of public nudity. Mr. Uhl said it is important to protect family values, which are “based on sexual modesty, not public promiscuity.” He explained that the state defines nude dancing as conduct, not speech, meaning it lacks protection under the First Amendment. Bruce Ennis, attorney for the Glen Theatre, said, "As long as the activity is an expressive activity, and as long as it does not meet the other standards for banning obscene activity, and the State has conceded that this is not obscene. close

Report Video Issue

People in this video

More People

Hosting Organization

More information about

Nude Dancing: Barnes v. Glen Theatre

6,780 Views
Program ID:
15676-1
Category:
Interview
Format:
News Conference
Location:
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
First Aired:
Jan 13, 1991 | 5:17am EST | C-SPAN 2
Last Aired:
Jun 22, 1991 | 7:41pm EDT | C-SPAN 1

Airing Details

  • Jan 13, 1991 | 5:17am EST | C-SPAN 2
  • Jun 22, 1991 | 7:41pm EDT | C-SPAN 1
Purchase a Download

Nude Dancing: Barnes v. Glen Theatre

  • MP3 audio - Standard
    Price:
    $0.99

User Created Clips from This Video