| Part Of Open Phones
Washington Journal
Report Video IssueWashington Journal
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
2006-07-01T07:49:16-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvMGQ3XC8xOTMyNDktMDItbS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==Lieutenant Commander Swift talked about the Supreme Court ruling in the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case. The Court ruled Thursday that the president did not have the authority to set up the tribunals at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and that military commissions are illegal under both military justice law and the Geneva Convention. It also ruled that Congress did not take away the Court’s authority to rule on the validity of military commissions. The Defense Department’s Office of Military Commissions assigned Lt. Commander Swift as Mr. Hamdan’s military defense lawyer. He argued Mr. Hamdan’s case in the lower courts, but was only present for the Supreme Court oral arguments in March.
Lieutenant Commander Swift talked about the Supreme Court ruling in the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case. The Court ruled Thursday that the president did not have the…
read more
Lieutenant Commander Swift talked about the Supreme Court ruling in the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case. The Court ruled Thursday that the president did not have the authority to set up the tribunals at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and that military commissions are illegal under both military justice law and the Geneva Convention. It also ruled that Congress did not take away the Court’s authority to rule on the validity of military commissions. The Defense Department’s Office of Military Commissions assigned Lt. Commander Swift as Mr. Hamdan’s military defense lawyer. He argued Mr. Hamdan’s case in the lower courts, but was only present for the Supreme Court oral arguments in March. close
Lieutenant Commander Swift talked about the Supreme Court ruling in the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case. The Court ruled Thursday that the president did not have the… read more
Lieutenant Commander Swift talked about the Supreme Court ruling in the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case. The Court ruled Thursday that the president did not have the authority to set up the tribunals at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and that military commissions are illegal under both military justice law and the Geneva Convention. It also ruled that Congress did not take away the Court’s authority to rule on the validity of military commissions. The Defense Department’s Office of Military Commissions assigned Lt. Commander Swift as Mr. Hamdan’s military defense lawyer. He argued Mr. Hamdan’s case in the lower courts, but was only present for the Supreme Court oral arguments in March. close
Purchase a Download
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Discussion of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Panelists discussed the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which was handed down the previous…
-
Military Tribunals Case
Mr. Rivkin talked about the op-ed piece he co-wrote with David Casey for the June 30 Wall Street Journal regarding his disagreement…
-
Military Commissions and Detainee Rights
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the rights of detained enemy combatants in response to the ruling by…
-
Detainee Rights
Professor David Cole of the Georgetown University Law Center talked about how Congress should respond to the issue of…