Judicial Nominations Hearing
While acknowledging Mr. Wallace’s professional credentials and integrity the American Bar Association unanimously voted that he was “not qualified” due to his judicial temperament and allegations of racial bias. Ms. Bryant, by majority vote, was also rated as “not qualified.”
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the nominations of Michael Wallace to the 5th Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals and of Vanessa Bryant to the U.S.… read more
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the nominations of Michael Wallace to the 5th Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals and of Vanessa Bryant to the U.S. District Court of Connecticut.
While acknowledging Mr. Wallace’s professional credentials and integrity the American Bar Association unanimously voted that he was “not qualified” due to his judicial temperament and allegations of racial bias. Ms. Bryant, by majority vote, was also rated as “not qualified.” close
People in this video
-
-
Pamela A. Bresnahan Member (Former) American Bar Association->Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Timothy Hopkins Member (Former) American Bar Association->Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Michael B. Wallace Attorney
-
Hosting Organization
Series
Related Video
-
Judicial and Executive Nominations
The Senate Committee on the Judiciary held a hearing on “Judicial and Executive Nominations.” The first witnesses were…
-
America and the Courts
America and the Courts focused on the Senate Judiciary Committee consideration of the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to…
-
Judicial Security and Independence
Justice Kennedy testified about Supreme Court and federal judiciary operations and funding requests. He was also…
-
Dismissal of U.S. Attorneys
Participating by telephone, Mr. Bresnahan reported on the House Judiciary Committee’s continuing investigation into the…