| Part Of Open Phones
Washington Journal
Report Video IssueWashington Journal
Open Phones
2007-05-11T07:00:03-04:00https://images.c-span.org/Files/0bc/197711-m.jpgTelephone lines were opened for comments on the question, “OxyContin maker: was it a fair penalty?” The question in the second half-hour was, “Is voting against a candidate’s religion bigotry?”
Telephone lines were opened for comments on the question, “OxyContin maker: was it a fair penalty?” The question in the second half-hour was, “Is voting against a candidate’s religion bigotry?”
Telephone lines were opened for comments on the question, “OxyContin maker: was it a fair penalty?” The question in the second half-hour was, “Is voting against a candidate’s religion bigotry?”
Purchase a Download
Open Phones
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Open Phones
Telephone lines were opened for comments on the topic, “The survey of Muslim Americans.” One telephone line was set…
-
Open Phones
Telephone lines were opened for first time callers only for comments on the question, “Has God blessed America?”
-
Open Phones
Telephone lines were opened for comments on the question, “Does a candidate’s religion matter?”
-
Q&A with John Micklethwait
John Micklethwait, the London-based editor in chief of The Economist magazine, talked about his special report on…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 6 minutes
- 1 view
-
- 30 minutes
- 1 view