Thomas Second Hearing Day 3, Part 3
1991-10-13T18:07:13-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNDJmXC8xOTkxMTAxMzE4MTc1OTAwMS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Senate Judiciary Committee heard testimony in support of U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Clarence Thomas from the second panel of witnesses on the third day of his reopened Supreme Court confirmation hearings. Witnesses on the second panel testified against the charges of University of Oklahoma Law Professor Anita Hill, who claimed Judge Thomas sexually harassed her when she worked for him in the Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the early 1980's. Ms. Berry-Meyers testified to Judge Thomas' circumspect managerial style in the EEOC, and said her “impression” was that Professor Hill desired a greater relationship with Judge Thomas than “just a professional one.” Ms. Alvarez criticized Professor Hill, calling her the “Rosa Parks of sexual harassment,” and said her allegations were a personal move on her part to advance her own interests. Dr. Fitch testified in support of Judge Thomas' character, as did Ms. Holt, who said Professor Hill never told
The Senate Judiciary Committee heard testimony in support of U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Clarence Thomas from the second panel of witnesses on the third day of his reopened… read more
The Senate Judiciary Committee heard testimony in support of U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Clarence Thomas from the second panel of witnesses on the third day of his reopened Supreme Court confirmation hearings. Witnesses on the second panel testified against the charges of University of Oklahoma Law Professor Anita Hill, who claimed Judge Thomas sexually harassed her when she worked for him in the Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the early 1980's. Ms. Berry-Meyers testified to Judge Thomas' circumspect managerial style in the EEOC, and said her “impression” was that Professor Hill desired a greater relationship with Judge Thomas than “just a professional one.” Ms. Alvarez criticized Professor Hill, calling her the “Rosa Parks of sexual harassment,” and said her allegations were a personal move on her part to advance her own interests. Dr. Fitch testified in support of Judge Thomas' character, as did Ms. Holt, who said Professor Hill never told close
People in this video
-
-
-
-
Nancy Fitch Special Assistant (Former) U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission->Office of the Chairman
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hosting Organization
Series
Purchase a Download
Thomas Second Hearing Day 3, Part 3
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $9.99 or Free with MyC‑SPAN
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Thomas Second Hearing Day 3, Part 1
The committee heard testimony from a panel of supporters of University of Oklahoma Law Professor Anita Hill to begin the…
-
Thomas Second Hearing Day 3, Part 5
The committee heard testimony from John Doggett in support of U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Clarence Thomas in Judge…
-
Thomas Second Hearing Day 3, Part 4
The committee continued to hear testimony from a panel of supporters of U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Clarence Thomas in…
-
Thomas Second Hearing Day 2, Part 2
The committee continued questioning of U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Clarence Thomas in his reopened Supreme Court confirmation…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 2 minutes
- 69 views
-
- 7 minutes
- 27 views
-
- 48 seconds
- 19 views
-
- 1 minute
- 19 views