FCC v. Fox Television Moot Court
2008-11-04T11:17:53-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvYmI1XC8yODIxMDEtbS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Bill of Rights Institute and William and Mary Law School hosted a moot court on the FCC v. Fox Television indecency case. The case rests on the FCC’s ban against the use of curse words in television broadcasts
Erwin Chermerinsky and Thomas Goldstein argued the case before Joan Biskupic, Robert Barnes, John Blume, Linda Greenhouse, John McGinnis, David Savage, Paul Smith, William Van Alstyne, and Timothy Zick. After the oral argument the judgment was shown. Then the panelists responded to questions from members of the audience.
This program contains language some may find offensive.
Erwin Chermerinsky and Thomas Goldstein argued the case before Joan Biskupic, Robert Barnes, John Blume, Linda Greenhouse, John McGinnis, David Savage, Paul Smith, William Van Alstyne, and Timothy Zick. After the oral argument the judgment was shown. Then the panelists responded to questions from members of the audience.
This program contains language some may find offensive.
The Bill of Rights Institute and William and Mary Law School hosted a moot court on the FCC v. Fox Television indecency case. The case rests on… read more
The Bill of Rights Institute and William and Mary Law School hosted a moot court on the FCC v. Fox Television indecency case. The case rests on the FCC’s ban against the use of curse words in television broadcasts
Erwin Chermerinsky and Thomas Goldstein argued the case before Joan Biskupic, Robert Barnes, John Blume, Linda Greenhouse, John McGinnis, David Savage, Paul Smith, William Van Alstyne, and Timothy Zick. After the oral argument the judgment was shown. Then the panelists responded to questions from members of the audience.
This program contains language some may find offensive. close
People in this video
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Paul M. Smith Attorney
-
-
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
FCC v. Fox Television Moot Court
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Supreme Court Preview, Panel 4
The panel talked about the previous term of the Supreme Court. They focused on the cases that the Supreme Court heard,…
-
Discussion on FCC v. Fox Television
America and the Courts previews the case of FCC v. Fox Television, scheduled to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 4,…
-
FCC v. Fox Television Reactions
Carter Phillips, the attorney representing Fox Television, spoke to the press after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the…
-
Safford Unified School v. Redding Reactions
Participants spoke to the press after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Safford Unified School…