| Part Of Washington Journal
Washington Journal
Report Video IssueWashington Journal
Supreme Court Hearing on Campaign Finance
2009-09-10T09:24:01-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvM2IwXC8yODg4MzItMTEtbS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==David Savage talked about Supreme Court oral argument on whether the court should overrule a 1990 decision, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications.
This case arose from a political documentary called Hillary: The Movie. The film’s producers lost a Federal Election Commission and lower court decision that prohibited them from distributing it on a video-on-demand service on grounds that it violated a McCain-Feingold ban on corporate money being used for electioneering.
David Savage talked about Supreme Court oral argument on whether the court should overrule a 1990 decision, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of…
read more
David Savage talked about Supreme Court oral argument on whether the court should overrule a 1990 decision, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications.
This case arose from a political documentary called Hillary: The Movie. The film’s producers lost a Federal Election Commission and lower court decision that prohibited them from distributing it on a video-on-demand service on grounds that it violated a McCain-Feingold ban on corporate money being used for electioneering. close
This case arose from a political documentary called Hillary: The Movie. The film’s producers lost a Federal Election Commission and lower court decision that prohibited them from distributing it on a video-on-demand service on grounds that it violated a McCain-Feingold ban on corporate money being used for electioneering.
David Savage talked about Supreme Court oral argument on whether the court should overrule a 1990 decision, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of… read more
David Savage talked about Supreme Court oral argument on whether the court should overrule a 1990 decision, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications.
This case arose from a political documentary called Hillary: The Movie. The film’s producers lost a Federal Election Commission and lower court decision that prohibited them from distributing it on a video-on-demand service on grounds that it violated a McCain-Feingold ban on corporate money being used for electioneering. close
People in this video
Hosting Organization
Series
More Videos From
Washington Journal
- Senator Coburn on Health Care Debate
- Open Phones
- Representative Perriello on Health Care Debate
- Open Phones
- Representative Barbara Lee on Health Care Debate
- Open Phones
- Representative Barton on Health Care Debate
- Supreme Court Hearing on Campaign Finance
Purchase a Download
Supreme Court Hearing on Campaign Finance
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $4.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Supreme Court Decision on Campaign Finance
Aaron Blake spoke by telephone about the 5-4 Supreme Court ruling that day on Citizens United v. Federal Election…
-
Open Phones, Part 1
Telephone lines were open for comments on the question, “Is it time for public campaign financing?”
-
Open Phones, Part 1
Telephone lines were open for comments on the question, “Is it time for public campaign financing?” C-SPAN Radio’s…
-
Campaign Spending and Disclosure Bill
President Obama spoke about campaign spending legislation being debated in the Senate, and already passed by the House.…