Supreme Court Health Care Argument Preview
Panelists previewed Supreme Court oral arguments on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care law, focusing on its requirement that all … read more
Panelists previewed Supreme Court oral arguments on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care law, focusing on its requirement that all Americans buy health insurance. Michael Carvin and Paul Clement asserted that the law does not have any limiting principles, reasoning that if Congress has the power to force citizens to buy health insurance, then, Congress can force them to buy anything, such as cars or certain foods. Akhil Amar and Neal Katyal disagreed, with Mr. Katyal arguing that health care differs because everyone will have to use health care services at some point in their lives. Following their discussion,, they answered questions from the audience. close
Related Video
-
Health Care Law Oral Argument Preview
Attorneys Andrew Pincus and Ilya Somin previewed the Supreme Court oral argument on the constitutionality of the 2010 he…
-
Reaction to Health Care Law Oral Arguments
Attorneys and plaintiffs involved in one of the 2010 health care law cases reacted to the second day of Supreme Court or…
-
Open Phones
Telephone lines were open for comments on remarks President Obama made earlier in the week on Supreme Court 2010 health …
-
Supreme Court and the 2010 Health Care Law
Supreme Court Attorney Michael Carvin spoke at the National Republican Lawyers Association policy Conference. Mr. Carvin…