| Part Of Washington Journal
Washington Journal
Report Video IssueWashington Journal
Campaign 2012 Funds and Super PACs
2012-11-12T08:35:13-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvMTRiXC8zMDkzNzgtMDUtbS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==Kathy Kiely talked about the role money played in the 2012 election, the first national campaign of the post-Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court decision. Topics included the top spenders, roles of super political action committees (SuperPacs), and efforts to rein in unregulated campaign contributions.
The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case eliminated restrictions on corporate funding for political candidates and causes, citing that the government lacks the right to “prohibit political speech, even if the speaker is a corporation or union.”
Kathy Kiely talked about the role money played in the 2012 election, the first national campaign of the post-Citizens United v. Federal Election…
read more
Kathy Kiely talked about the role money played in the 2012 election, the first national campaign of the post-Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court decision. Topics included the top spenders, roles of super political action committees (SuperPacs), and efforts to rein in unregulated campaign contributions.
The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case eliminated restrictions on corporate funding for political candidates and causes, citing that the government lacks the right to “prohibit political speech, even if the speaker is a corporation or union.” close
The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case eliminated restrictions on corporate funding for political candidates and causes, citing that the government lacks the right to “prohibit political speech, even if the speaker is a corporation or union.”
Kathy Kiely talked about the role money played in the 2012 election, the first national campaign of the post-Citizens United v. Federal Election… read more
Kathy Kiely talked about the role money played in the 2012 election, the first national campaign of the post-Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court decision. Topics included the top spenders, roles of super political action committees (SuperPacs), and efforts to rein in unregulated campaign contributions.
The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case eliminated restrictions on corporate funding for political candidates and causes, citing that the government lacks the right to “prohibit political speech, even if the speaker is a corporation or union.” close
People in this video
Hosting Organization
Series
More Videos From
Washington Journal
- Immigration Reform and Latino Voter Turnout
- Campaign 2012 Funds and Super PACs
- Tax Rates and the Fiscal Cliff
Purchase a Download
Campaign 2012 Funds and Super PACs
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $4.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Campaign Finance
Political strategists and campaign consultants talked about campaign finance and the influence of super political…
-
Fundraising and the 2012 Elections
Sheila Krumholz talked about the latest Federal Election Commission fundraising numbers for campaigns and super political action…
-
Super PACs and the 2012 Elections
Guest Craig Holman discussed the future of campaign finance in regard to the Supreme Court Citizens United v. Federal…
-
Corporate Funds spent on Super Political Action Committees
Representatives from a coalition of groups held a news conference to announce their campaign to target companies that…