Riley v. California Oral Argument
The court on June 25, 2014, ruled 9-0 that a warrant is required to search a mobile phone.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case Riley v. California. The plaintiff, David Riley, was convicted on several criminal… read more
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case Riley v. California. The plaintiff, David Riley, was convicted on several criminal counts, based on evidence from a cell phone seized in a traffic stop. The court was to decide what types of Fourth Amendment protections should be extended to data stored on smart phones.
The court on June 25, 2014, ruled 9-0 that a warrant is required to search a mobile phone. close
People in this video
More PeopleHosting Organization
Related Video
-
U.S. v. Wurie Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in U.S. v Wurie. The issue before the court was whether police must obtain a search warrant…
-
Riley v. California Commentary, Part 1
Mike Doyle gave background of the case Riley v. California, a U.S. Supreme Court case about whether police must obtain…
-
Heien v. North Carolina Oral Argument
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heien v. North Carolina, docket number 13-604. At issue in the case was whether a police…
-
Rodriguez v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Rodriguez v. United States, docket number 13-9972. The case addressed whether a…