Heien v. North Carolina Oral Argument
The court on December 14, 2014, ruled that a police officer’s reasonable mistake of law can provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to justify a traffic stop based upon that understanding.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heien v. North Carolina, docket number 13-604. At issue in the case was whether a police officer’s… read more
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heien v. North Carolina, docket number 13-604. At issue in the case was whether a police officer’s “mistake of law” was legal justification under the Fourth Amendment for a traffic stop and subsequent search.
The court on December 14, 2014, ruled that a police officer’s reasonable mistake of law can provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to justify a traffic stop based upon that understanding. close
People in this video
-
-
-
-
-
-
Robert C. Montgomery Senior Deputy Attorney General North Carolina Department of Justice->Criminal Division
-
-
-
-
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar, docket number 13-1499. The case involved campaign…
-
Rodriguez v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Rodriguez v. United States, docket number 13-9972. The case addressed whether a…
-
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., docket number…
-
Riley v. California Oral Argument
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case Riley v. California. The plaintiff, David Riley, was convicted…