Maya Arce v. John Huppenthal Oral Argument
The Arizona ban, passed in 2010, prohibited a course or class that “promotes the overthrow of the U.S. government, promotes resentment toward a race or class of people and is designed for pupils of a particular ethnic group.”
A three-judge panel at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Maya Arce v. John Huppenthal, on the constitutionality of Arizona’s… read more
A three-judge panel at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Maya Arce v. John Huppenthal, on the constitutionality of Arizona’s ban on ethnic studies programs in public schools. The ban led to a dismantling of a Mexican-American studies program in the Tucson Unified School District. A group of students sued, arguing the law was overly broad, discriminatory, and violated free speech.
The Arizona ban, passed in 2010, prohibited a course or class that “promotes the overthrow of the U.S. government, promotes resentment toward a race or class of people and is designed for pupils of a particular ethnic group.” close
People in this video
More PeopleHosting Organization
Related Video
-
Despite the Best Intentions
John Diamond was interviewed about the book he co-authored, Despite the Best Intentions: How Racial Inequality Thrives in…
-
La Calle
Lydia Otero talked about her book La Calle: Spatial Conflicts and Urban Renewal in a Southwest City, in which she talks about urban renewal in…
-
Constitutionality of Arizona's Immigration Law
Current and former Arizona state officials testified on the constitutionality of their state’s immigration law and its impact on…
-
Arizona Immigration Law
Daniel Gonzalez was interviewed by phone about Arizona’s immigration law.