Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security Agency Oral Argument
2016-12-23T18:11:04-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNTBkXC8yMDE2MTIyMzA1MjQ1ODAwMl9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security Agency, a case challenging the National Security Agency’s (NSA) mass interception and searching of Americans' international internet communications. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) brought the case on behalf of several groups including the Wikimedia Foundation, The Nation magazine, and Amnesty International USA.
The issue concerned the NSA’s “upstream” surveillance program which searched communications such as emails, chats, and web-browsing traffic as it traveled back and forth between the U.S. and foreign entities on the “internet backbone,” a network of high-capacity cables, switches, and routers that carry Americans' domestic and international internet communications.
On May 23, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Wikimedia Foundation has standing to challenge the NSA’s mass interception of Americans' international internet communications.
The issue concerned the NSA’s “upstream” surveillance program which searched communications such as emails, chats, and web-browsing traffic as it traveled back and forth between the U.S. and foreign entities on the “internet backbone,” a network of high-capacity cables, switches, and routers that carry Americans' domestic and international internet communications.
On May 23, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Wikimedia Foundation has standing to challenge the NSA’s mass interception of Americans' international internet communications.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security Agency, a case challenging the National Security Agency’s (NSA) mass… read more
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security Agency, a case challenging the National Security Agency’s (NSA) mass interception and searching of Americans' international internet communications. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) brought the case on behalf of several groups including the Wikimedia Foundation, The Nation magazine, and Amnesty International USA.
The issue concerned the NSA’s “upstream” surveillance program which searched communications such as emails, chats, and web-browsing traffic as it traveled back and forth between the U.S. and foreign entities on the “internet backbone,” a network of high-capacity cables, switches, and routers that carry Americans' domestic and international internet communications.
On May 23, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Wikimedia Foundation has standing to challenge the NSA’s mass interception of Americans' international internet communications. close
People in this video
- Catherine H. Dorsey Appellate Staff Attorney Department of Justice->Civil Division
-
-
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security Agency Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $4.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Code Warriors
Stephen Budiansky talked about his book, Code Warriors: NSA’s Codebreakers and the Secret Intelligence War Against the Soviet…
-
U.S. v. Mohamed Mohamud Oral Argument
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in U.S. v. Mohamed Mohamud, a case challenging the National Security Agency (NSA)…
-
Brent Skorup on Digital Privacy Rights
Brent Skorup talked about the Supreme Court’s decision to hear a major cellphone privacy case.
-
Federal Surveillance and Civil Rights
American University lecturer Aaron Bell taught a class about privacy laws and federal surveillance of civil rights…