Christie v. NCAA Oral Argument
2017-12-11T21:54:32-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvYTZjXC8yMDE3MTIxMTIxNTUzMTAwMV9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Christie v. NCAA. The case concerns whether a federal statute, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA), which prohibits sports wagering in most state, violates the Tenth Amendment’s prohibition of the federal government from commandeering states into enforcing federal law. The case was brought by Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ), who sought to bring legalized sports betting to his state. The nation’s four major professional sports leagues joined the NCAA as respondents to uphold the federal law prohibiting sports gambling. The court consolidated the case with N.J. Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association v. NCAA.
On May 14, 2018, the Court ruled that the 1992 law was unconstitutional.
On May 14, 2018, the Court ruled that the 1992 law was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Christie v. NCAA. The case concerns whether a federal statute, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Christie v. NCAA. The case concerns whether a federal statute, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA), which prohibits sports wagering in most state, violates the Tenth Amendment’s prohibition of the federal government from commandeering states into enforcing federal law. The case was brought by Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ), who sought to bring legalized sports betting to his state. The nation’s four major professional sports leagues joined the NCAA as respondents to uphold the federal law prohibiting sports gambling. The court consolidated the case with N.J. Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association v. NCAA.
On May 14, 2018, the Court ruled that the 1992 law was unconstitutional. close
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Stephen G. Breyer Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Paul D. Clement Attorney - Ruth Bader Ginsburg Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Paula Roberts Jackson President and CEO American Association of Blacks in Energy
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Anthony M. Kennedy Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Theodore "Ted" B. Olson Attorney
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Christie v. NCAA Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Carpenter v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Carpenter v. United States. The case concerns whether a search warrant is needed for law…
-
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, a case concerning whether a Minnesota Election Day law violates a person’s…
-
Byrd v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Byrd v. United States. The case centers on whether drivers have a reasonable…
-
Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31 Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 2 minutes
- 21 views