Byrd v. United States Oral Argument
2018-01-16T02:49:05-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNDlkXC8yMDE4MDExNjAyNDkyOTAwMV9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Byrd v. United States. The case centers on whether drivers have a reasonable expectation of privacy while in a rental car they did not rent and are not authorized under the rental agreement to operate. In 2014, Terrence Byrd’s girlfriend rented a car and gave him permission to drive it. While driving, police pulled him over. conducted a warrantless search, and found drugs and body armor in the vehicle. He was arrested and charged. Mr. Byrd appealed to a federal district court, which ruled against him saying he had no expectation of privacy because he was not listed in the rental contract. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with this ruling.
On May 14, 2018, the Court ruled unanimously that a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy while in a rental car that she or he did not rent and is not authorized under the rental agreement to operate.
On May 14, 2018, the Court ruled unanimously that a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy while in a rental car that she or he did not rent and is not authorized under the rental agreement to operate.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Byrd v. United States. The case centers on whether drivers have a reasonable expectation of privacy… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Byrd v. United States. The case centers on whether drivers have a reasonable expectation of privacy while in a rental car they did not rent and are not authorized under the rental agreement to operate. In 2014, Terrence Byrd’s girlfriend rented a car and gave him permission to drive it. While driving, police pulled him over. conducted a warrantless search, and found drugs and body armor in the vehicle. He was arrested and charged. Mr. Byrd appealed to a federal district court, which ruled against him saying he had no expectation of privacy because he was not listed in the rental contract. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with this ruling.
On May 14, 2018, the Court ruled unanimously that a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy while in a rental car that she or he did not rent and is not authorized under the rental agreement to operate. close
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
-
-
-
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Anthony M. Kennedy Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Robert Loeb Attorney
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Byrd v. United States Oral Argument
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
McCoy v. Louisiana Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in McCoy v. Louisiana. The case concerns whether a death row inmate’s Sixth Amendment…
-
Dahda v. U.S. Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Dahda v. U.S.. The case concerns twin brothers Los and Roosevelt Dahda who were convicted of…
-
Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31 Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31…
-
United States v. Microsoft Corporation Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Microsoft Corporation, a case dealing with warrant compliance…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 1 hour
- 20 views
-
- 1 minute
- 6 views