Trump v. Hawaii Oral Argument
2018-04-25T19:32:33-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNTdiXC8yMDE4MDQyNTE5MzMyMTAwMl9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. Hawaii, a case about the third version of the president’s travel ban. Issued in September 2017, the proclamation places travel restrictions on nationals from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Somalia, Venezuela and Yemen. Chad was originally on the list but was removed. In December 2017 a three-judge panel from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California ruled the travel ban unconstitutional.
The Court ruled 5-4 on June 26, 2018, that the president’s travel ban was constitutional and that he had authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to issue such a proclamation.
The Court ruled 5-4 on June 26, 2018, that the president’s travel ban was constitutional and that he had authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to issue such a proclamation.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. Hawaii, a case about the third version of the president’s travel ban. Issued in September 2017,… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. Hawaii, a case about the third version of the president’s travel ban. Issued in September 2017, the proclamation places travel restrictions on nationals from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Somalia, Venezuela and Yemen. Chad was originally on the list but was removed. In December 2017 a three-judge panel from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California ruled the travel ban unconstitutional.
The Court ruled 5-4 on June 26, 2018, that the president’s travel ban was constitutional and that he had authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to issue such a proclamation. close
People in this video
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Trump v. Hawaii Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
South Dakota v. Wayfair Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument for South Dakota v. Wayfair, a case concerning whether a state can impose a sales tax on internet…
-
Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31 Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31…
-
Byrd v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Byrd v. United States. The case centers on whether drivers have a reasonable…
-
Husted v. Randolph Institute Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument for Husted v. Randolph Institute. The case concerns whether Ohio’s voter purge policy…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 1 minute
- 21 views
-
- 16 seconds
- 16 views
-
- 37 seconds
- 12 views
-
- 32 seconds
- 4 views