NIFLA v. Becerra Oral Argument
2018-03-23T20:00:24-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNTVkXC8yMDE4MDMyMzIwMDA1MDAwMl9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra, a case concerning California’s abortion disclosure law and free speech. Under the Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act, “pro-life” clinics known as “crisis pregnancy centers” must tell patients about all the medical services available to them, including state programs that provide free or low-cost access to family planning services, contraception, and abortion. Centers that are not licensed must disclose that information to patients as well. These centers and the National Institute of Family and Life argue that the law violates their freedom of speech because they must tell women about abortion services, and in doing so go against their beliefs and mission.
On June 26, 2018, the Court in a 5-4 vote struck down California’s Reproductive FACT Act.
On June 26, 2018, the Court in a 5-4 vote struck down California’s Reproductive FACT Act.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra, a case concerning California’s abortion disclosure law and… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra, a case concerning California’s abortion disclosure law and free speech. Under the Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act, “pro-life” clinics known as “crisis pregnancy centers” must tell patients about all the medical services available to them, including state programs that provide free or low-cost access to family planning services, contraception, and abortion. Centers that are not licensed must disclose that information to patients as well. These centers and the National Institute of Family and Life argue that the law violates their freedom of speech because they must tell women about abortion services, and in doing so go against their beliefs and mission.
On June 26, 2018, the Court in a 5-4 vote struck down California’s Reproductive FACT Act. close
People in this video
-
-
-
-
- Anthony M. Kennedy Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
-
-
-
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
NIFLA v. Becerra Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Benisek v. Lamone Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument for Benisek v. Lamone, a case concerning political gerrymandering in Maryland.…
-
American Legion v. American Humanist Association Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two consolidated cases, American Legion v. American Humanist Association and Maryland-National…
-
Lamone v. Benisek Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lamone v. Benisek, a case on partisan gerrymandering. Republican voters in…
-
Iancu v. Brunetti Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Iancu v. Brunetti. The case concerns trademark law and the Lanham Act, which allows the U.S. Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) to refuse applications it considers…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 1 hour
- 65 views
-
- 45 seconds
- 38 views