Pereira v. Sessions Oral Argument
2018-04-30T23:05:48-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvMTZkXC8yMDE4MDQzMDIzMDU1MDAwMV9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Pereira v. Sessions. The case concerns immigrant removal statutes and the deportation notice of a Brazilian man who entered the U.S. on a tourist visa in 2000. The Homeland Security Department (DHS) in 2006 sent him a deportation notice to appear for overstaying his visa, but the notice gave no specific hearing date or time, only that it would be in the future. A letter with a date and time to appear was eventually sent to the his street address, but he never got it because he receives his mail through a post office box. A deportation hearing was held in October 2007, and as a no-show he was ordered deported. In 2013, he was pulled over and arrested by police for operating a vehicle under the influence and detained by DHS. He then applied for a removal cancellation.
On June 21, 2018, the Court ruled that the federal government cannot stop an immigrant’s continuous residence time by issuing a notice to appear without a date and time on it.
On June 21, 2018, the Court ruled that the federal government cannot stop an immigrant’s continuous residence time by issuing a notice to appear without a date and time on it.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Pereira v. Sessions. The case concerns immigrant removal statutes and the deportation notice of a B… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Pereira v. Sessions. The case concerns immigrant removal statutes and the deportation notice of a Brazilian man who entered the U.S. on a tourist visa in 2000. The Homeland Security Department (DHS) in 2006 sent him a deportation notice to appear for overstaying his visa, but the notice gave no specific hearing date or time, only that it would be in the future. A letter with a date and time to appear was eventually sent to the his street address, but he never got it because he receives his mail through a post office box. A deportation hearing was held in October 2007, and as a no-show he was ordered deported. In 2013, he was pulled over and arrested by police for operating a vehicle under the influence and detained by DHS. He then applied for a removal cancellation.
On June 21, 2018, the Court ruled that the federal government cannot stop an immigrant’s continuous residence time by issuing a notice to appear without a date and time on it. close
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
-
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Anthony M. Kennedy Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
David Zimmer Attorney
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Pereira v. Sessions Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $4.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Abbott v. Perez Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Abbott v. Perez, a consolidated case concerning redistricting in Texas. This ca…
-
Nielsen v. Preap Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Nielsen v. Preap, an immigration law case that challenges a federal provision r…
-
Jennings v. Rodriguez Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument for Jennings v. Rodriguez, a re-argument from the previous term when there were on…
-
Sessions v. Dimaya Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument for Sessions v. Dimaya, a re-argument from the previous term when there were only …
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 2 minutes
- 51 views