Regents of UC v. Department of Homeland Security Oral Argument
2018-05-15T15:59:52-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNDQwXC8yMDE4MDUxNTE2MTMzNDAwM19oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Regents of the University of California v. Department of Homeland Security, on President Trump’s decision to end the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. The three-judge panel was to consider whether the president had the legal authority to rescind the immigration program started under his predecessor, President Obama. The Trump administration announced in 2017 the program would be canceled on a phased-out approach. In January 2018, a San Francisco judge issued a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking the president’s decision to end DACA.
On November 8, 2018, the court ruled that President Trump’s decision to end DACA was likely “arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
On November 8, 2018, the court ruled that President Trump’s decision to end DACA was likely “arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Regents of the University of California v. Department of Homeland Security, on President Trump’s decision to… read more
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Regents of the University of California v. Department of Homeland Security, on President Trump’s decision to end the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. The three-judge panel was to consider whether the president had the legal authority to rescind the immigration program started under his predecessor, President Obama. The Trump administration announced in 2017 the program would be canceled on a phased-out approach. In January 2018, a San Francisco judge issued a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking the president’s decision to end DACA.
On November 8, 2018, the court ruled that President Trump’s decision to end DACA was likely “arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” close
People in this video
-
Jeffrey Davidson Attorney -
-
-
-
-
Mark Rosenbaum Attorney
-
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Regents of UC v. Department of Homeland Security Oral Argument
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
City and County of San Francisco v. Donald Trump Oral Argument
The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral argument for City and County of San Francisco v. Trump, a case concerning the president’s…
-
Hawaii v. Trump Oral Argument
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle heard oral argument for the State of Hawaii v. Trump, a case addressing the…
-
Rescission of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program
The Senate Judiciary Committee held an oversight hearing on President Trump’s decision to end the Deferred Action for…
-
Mark Krikorian on Plan to Overturn DACA
Mark Krikorian talked about the Trump administration’s decision to rescind the Obama administration’s Deferred Action…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 2 minutes
- 104 views
-
- 28 minutes
- 52 views
-
- 13 minutes
- 34 views
-
- 3 minutes
- 26 views