Rucho v. Common Cause Oral Argument
2019-06-28T04:48:04-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvYzc4XC8yMDE5MDYyODA1NTkwNDAwMV9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Rucho v. Common Cause, a case concerning North Carolina’s congressional district map. The map in 2016 was ruled unconstitutional because of partisan gerrymandering. Two state Republican legislators led the effort to redraw the map, and they told the mapmakers to consider among their criteria the political makeup of the state’s congressional delegation of 10 Republicans and three Democrats. Those new maps were adopted along party lines and used for the 2016 and 2018 elections. In the 2016 elections, Republicans won 10 the congressional seats, Democrats three. Voter and groups that included Common Cause, the League of Women Voters of North Carolina, and the North Carolina Democratic Party all filed suit, arguing partisan gerrymandering.
On June 27, 2-19, the Court ruled 5-4 against challengers in the case that partisan gerrymandering is a matter of politics and not a matter for the judicial branch to take up.
On June 27, 2-19, the Court ruled 5-4 against challengers in the case that partisan gerrymandering is a matter of politics and not a matter for the judicial branch to take up.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Rucho v. Common Cause, a case concerning North Carolina’s congressional district map. The map in 2016… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Rucho v. Common Cause, a case concerning North Carolina’s congressional district map. The map in 2016 was ruled unconstitutional because of partisan gerrymandering. Two state Republican legislators led the effort to redraw the map, and they told the mapmakers to consider among their criteria the political makeup of the state’s congressional delegation of 10 Republicans and three Democrats. Those new maps were adopted along party lines and used for the 2016 and 2018 elections. In the 2016 elections, Republicans won 10 the congressional seats, Democrats three. Voter and groups that included Common Cause, the League of Women Voters of North Carolina, and the North Carolina Democratic Party all filed suit, arguing partisan gerrymandering.
On June 27, 2-19, the Court ruled 5-4 against challengers in the case that partisan gerrymandering is a matter of politics and not a matter for the judicial branch to take up. close
People in this video
-
Emmet J. Bondurant Attorney - Stephen G. Breyer Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Allison Riggs Attorney
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
-
Paul D. Clement Attorney
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Rucho v. Common Cause Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Lamone v. Benisek Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lamone v. Benisek, a case on partisan gerrymandering. Republican voters in…
-
Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill. The case concerns whether 11 Virginia congressional…
-
Iancu v. Brunetti Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Iancu v. Brunetti. The case concerns trademark law and the Lanham Act, which allows the U.S. Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) to refuse applications it considers…
-
Unites States v. Davis Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Davis. The case concerns whether using a weapon while committing a crime is a “crime…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 7 minutes
- 10 views