U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V. Oral Argument
2020-05-04T17:53:23-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNTU4XC8yMDIwMDUwNDEwMTAzNjAwMV9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Supreme Court for the first time in history heard oral argument via teleconference. The case, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V., involved a travel reservation company’s fight to trademark its booking.com website. The online company in 2011 and 2012 filed trademark applications with the U.S. Patent and Trade Office (USPTO). Those applications were denied, with the agency saying that booking.com is too generic for legal protections. Under the law, only distinguishable terms that can be separated from other products and services can be trademarked. The company won a federal court suit, with the ruling citing that adding “.com” to the end makes it not generic. The USPTO filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, noting instances in which adding the .com does not work.
Justice Thomas asked a question for the first time since March 2019.
Justice Thomas asked a question for the first time since March 2019.
Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Supreme Court for the first time in history heard oral argument via teleconference. The case, U.S. Pate… read more
Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Supreme Court for the first time in history heard oral argument via teleconference. The case, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V., involved a travel reservation company’s fight to trademark its booking.com website. The online company in 2011 and 2012 filed trademark applications with the U.S. Patent and Trade Office (USPTO). Those applications were denied, with the agency saying that booking.com is too generic for legal protections. Under the law, only distinguishable terms that can be separated from other products and services can be trademarked. The company won a federal court suit, with the ruling citing that adding “.com” to the end makes it not generic. The USPTO filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, noting instances in which adding the .com does not work.
Justice Thomas asked a question for the first time since March 2019. close
Resources
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and tap the screen to see the at the bottom of the player. Tap the to see a complete list of all Points of Interest - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
SCOTUSblog is an independent organization and their commentary does not represent the views of C‑SPAN.
SCOTUSblog is an independent organization and their commentary does not represent the views of C‑SPAN.
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and move your cursor over the video to see the . Click on the marker to see the description and watch.
You can also click the in the lower left of the video player to see a complete list of all Points of Interest from this program - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
People in this video
-
Lisa Blatt Attorney - Stephen G. Breyer Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Erica Ross Assistant to the Solicitor General Department of Justice->Office of the Solicitor General
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
-
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V. Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument on Health Care Law Birth Control Mandate Exemption Expansion
Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Supreme Court heard via teleconference oral argument in Little Sisters of the Poor …
-
United States v. Sineneng-Smith Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Sineneng-Smith, a case concerning a federal law forbidding enc…
-
Kelly v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kelly v. United States. The case concerns the federal corruption convictions of…
-
New York State Rifle and Pistol v. City of New York Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle and Pistol and Association v. City of New York, the first …
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 25 seconds
- 215 views
-
- 27 seconds
- 188 views
-
- 29 seconds
- 138 views
-
- 32 seconds
- 83 views