McGirt v. Oklahoma Oral Argument
2020-05-11T10:00:02-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvOThlXC8yMDIwMDUxMTEwMTkzMDAwMV9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference in McGirt v. Oklahoma, a case concerning state versus federal criminal jurisdiction on Indian lands. Jimcy McGirt, a convicted sex offender in Oklahoma and a member of the Seminole Nation tribe, argued that the state in 1997 did not have jurisdiction to convict him of rape and other sex crimes on land believed to belong to the Creek Reservation. Under the Indian Major Crimes Act, any crime involving a Native American individual or victim that occurred on Indian land falls under federal jurisdiction. The justices were to rule on whether the crime indeed happened on Indian land, and whether Congress disestablished this land. The issue of whether the land was disestablished came before the Court in 2018, but the justices did not issue a ruling.
On July 9, 2020, the Court ruled 5-4 held that land throughout much of eastern Oklahoma reserved for the Creek Nation since the 19th century remains a Native American territory.
On July 9, 2020, the Court ruled 5-4 held that land throughout much of eastern Oklahoma reserved for the Creek Nation since the 19th century remains a Native American territory.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference in McGirt v. Oklahoma, a case concerning state versus federal criminal… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference in McGirt v. Oklahoma, a case concerning state versus federal criminal jurisdiction on Indian lands. Jimcy McGirt, a convicted sex offender in Oklahoma and a member of the Seminole Nation tribe, argued that the state in 1997 did not have jurisdiction to convict him of rape and other sex crimes on land believed to belong to the Creek Reservation. Under the Indian Major Crimes Act, any crime involving a Native American individual or victim that occurred on Indian land falls under federal jurisdiction. The justices were to rule on whether the crime indeed happened on Indian land, and whether Congress disestablished this land. The issue of whether the land was disestablished came before the Court in 2018, but the justices did not issue a ruling.
On July 9, 2020, the Court ruled 5-4 held that land throughout much of eastern Oklahoma reserved for the Creek Nation since the 19th century remains a Native American territory. close
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and tap the screen to see the at the bottom of the player. Tap the to see a complete list of all Points of Interest - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
SCOTUSblog is an independent organization and their commentary does not represent the views of C‑SPAN.
SCOTUSblog is an independent organization and their commentary does not represent the views of C‑SPAN.
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and move your cursor over the video to see the . Click on the marker to see the description and watch.
You can also click the in the lower left of the video player to see a complete list of all Points of Interest from this program - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Stephen G. Breyer Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Ian H. Gershengorn Attorney - Ruth Bader Ginsburg Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Riyaz Kanji Attorney
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
-
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
McGirt v. Oklahoma Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
United States v. Sineneng-Smith Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Sineneng-Smith, a case concerning a federal law forbidding…
-
Kelly v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kelly v. United States. The case concerns the federal corruption convictions of two people…
-
Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, a case concerning…
-
New York State Rifle and Pistol v. City of New York Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle and Pistol and Association v. City of New York, the first major gun…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 1 minute
- 33 views
-
- 1 minute
- 16 views
-
- 1 minute
- 15 views
-
- 2 minutes
- 10 views