Review of Supreme Court Oral Argument on States' Popular Votes and the Electoral College
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following Supreme Court oral argument in Chiafalo v. Washington and Colorado Department… read more
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following Supreme Court oral argument in Chiafalo v. Washington and Colorado Department of State v. Baca. The two cases concern whether electors must vote for the winner of a state’s popular vote in the Electoral College. David Kopel, research director for the Independence Institute and law professor at the University of Denver, and Paul Smith, vice president of litigation and strategy at the Campaign Legal Center, joined the discussion moderated by National Constitution Center President and CEO Jeffrey Rosen. close
People in this video
-
Paul M. Smith Attorney
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
Chiafalo v. Washington Oral Argument
On its final day of a special May session due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference…
-
Greg Stohr on "Faithless Electors" Supreme Court Case
Greg Stohr spoke by phone about that day’s Supreme Court oral arguments on a case involving rules regarding presidential…
-
Review of Supreme Court Oral Argument in Subpoena of President Trump's Tax Returns
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following Supreme Court oral arguments in a number of cases dealing with…
-
Review of Supreme Court Oral Argument in McGirt v. Oklahoma
The National Constitution Center held a panel discussion following Supreme Court oral argument in McGirt v. Oklahoma. The case…