Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid Oral Argument
2021-04-10T17:18:19-04:00https://images.c-span.org/Files/28b/20201130100016001_hd.jpgThe Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a case concerning the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause and union organizing. Under a California regulation, union organizers may enter the property of agricultural businesses to talk with employees about supporting a union. Unions are supposed to give businesses notice and time before a visit, and hours and number of visits are limited. In 2015, the United Farm Workers union tried unsuccessfully to gain access to Cedar Point Nursery and another business. Cedar Point Nursery and the union filed separate complaints with California’s Agriculture Labor Relations Board. Cedar Point Nursery also filed suit against the board, arguing the regulation to give unions access to their work sites amounts to an unjust and uncompensated taking of property.
The Court on June 23, 2021, ruled 6-3 that the California regulation is unconstitutional.
The Court on June 23, 2021, ruled 6-3 that the California regulation is unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a case concerning the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause and union… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a case concerning the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause and union organizing. Under a California regulation, union organizers may enter the property of agricultural businesses to talk with employees about supporting a union. Unions are supposed to give businesses notice and time before a visit, and hours and number of visits are limited. In 2015, the United Farm Workers union tried unsuccessfully to gain access to Cedar Point Nursery and another business. Cedar Point Nursery and the union filed separate complaints with California’s Agriculture Labor Relations Board. Cedar Point Nursery also filed suit against the board, arguing the regulation to give unions access to their work sites amounts to an unjust and uncompensated taking of property.
The Court on June 23, 2021, ruled 6-3 that the California regulation is unconstitutional. close
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Stephen G. Breyer Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Transunion LLC v. Ramirez Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Transunion LLC v. Ramirez, a case on civil procedural law.
-
Carr v. Saul Consolidated Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Carr v. Saul, a case concerning whether a claimant seeking disability benefits…
-
City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L.P. Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, a case on interpretation of civil…
-
Minerva Surgical, Inc v. Hologic, Inc Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., a case on patent-infringement action.…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 4 minutes
- 4 views
-
- 42 seconds
- 2 views