Siegel v. Fitzgerald Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, a case on bankruptcy law.
Vega v. Tekoh Oral Argument
2022-04-20T10:00:32-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNjg0XC8yMDIyMDQyMDA5NTkwODAxMF9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Vega v. Tekoh, a case concerning Miranda warnings. In March 2014, Terence Tekoh was detained by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for sexual assault allegations, with deputy Carlos Vega failing to give Mr. Tekoh a Miranda warning. Mr. Tekoh confessed to the charge in a written statement, and was subsequently prosecuted for the allegation. At his trial, the government introduced Mr. Tekoh’s statement that was made without his being read his Miranda rights, and he was ultimately acquitted. Mr. Tekoh then sued Mr. Vega, asserting he violated his rights under Miranda v. Arizona by not warning him of his right to remain silent. Two juries held that Vega had not violated Miranda.
On June 23, 2022, the Court ruled 6-3 that a police officer cannot be sued under federal civil rights laws for violating a person’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination by failing to provide a Miranda warning.
On June 23, 2022, the Court ruled 6-3 that a police officer cannot be sued under federal civil rights laws for violating a person’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination by failing to provide a Miranda warning.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Vega v. Tekoh, a case concerning Miranda warnings. In March 2014, Terence Tekoh was detained by the Los Angeles… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Vega v. Tekoh, a case concerning Miranda warnings. In March 2014, Terence Tekoh was detained by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for sexual assault allegations, with deputy Carlos Vega failing to give Mr. Tekoh a Miranda warning. Mr. Tekoh confessed to the charge in a written statement, and was subsequently prosecuted for the allegation. At his trial, the government introduced Mr. Tekoh’s statement that was made without his being read his Miranda rights, and he was ultimately acquitted. Mr. Tekoh then sued Mr. Vega, asserting he violated his rights under Miranda v. Arizona by not warning him of his right to remain silent. Two juries held that Vega had not violated Miranda.
On June 23, 2022, the Court ruled 6-3 that a police officer cannot be sued under federal civil rights laws for violating a person’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination by failing to provide a Miranda warning. close
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Stephen G. Breyer Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Paul Hoffman Partner Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris and Hoffman, LLP
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Roman Martinez Attorney
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Vivek Suri Assistant to the Solicitor General Department of Justice->Office of the Solicitor General
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Vega v. Tekoh Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
-
Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, a case on civil procedure and…
-
Garland v. Gonzalez Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Garland v. Gonzalez, a case on bond hearings for detained non-U.S. citizens.…
-
Gallardo v. Marstiller Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Gallardo v. Marstiller, a case concerning Medicaid recovery costs.