Andy Warhol Foundation for the Arts v. Goldsmith Oral Argument
2022-10-23T14:28:21-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvZWQ3XC8wMDFcLzE2NjY1NDk3NDdfMDAxLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJmaXQiOiJjb3ZlciIsImhlaWdodCI6NTA2fX19The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Arts v. Goldsmith, a copyright case concerning artist Andy Warhol’s use of photographer Lynn Goldsmith’s work in his 16 silkscreens of the musician Prince. In 2016, Condé Nast published the “Orange Prince” silkscreen after Prince’s overdose death. Ms. Goldsmith received no credit or monetary payment for this publishing, so she filed suit alleging copyright infringement. Mr. Warhol’s legal team argued his silkscreens, including the “Orange Prince,” were transformed as well as portrayed a different meaning and message than the original photo and is therefore allowed under the copyright law’s “Fair Use” doctrine that permits copyrighted work to be used if there was a major transformation from the original work.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Arts v. Goldsmith, a copyright case concerning artist Andy Warhol’s … read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Arts v. Goldsmith, a copyright case concerning artist Andy Warhol’s use of photographer Lynn Goldsmith’s work in his 16 silkscreens of the musician Prince. In 2016, Condé Nast published the “Orange Prince” silkscreen after Prince’s overdose death. Ms. Goldsmith received no credit or monetary payment for this publishing, so she filed suit alleging copyright infringement. Mr. Warhol’s legal team argued his silkscreens, including the “Orange Prince,” were transformed as well as portrayed a different meaning and message than the original photo and is therefore allowed under the copyright law’s “Fair Use” doctrine that permits copyrighted work to be used if there was a major transformation from the original work. close
Resources
- Andy Warhol Foundation for the Arts v. Goldsmith 7-2 Decision
U.S. Supreme Court
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Lisa Blatt Attorney -
Yaira Dubin Assistant to U.S. Solicitor General Department of Justice->Office of the Solicitor General
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Ketanji Brown Jackson Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Roman Martinez Attorney
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Arts v. Goldsmith Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Featured Clips from This Video
-
Justice Thomas: "Let's Say I'm a Prince Fan"
During oral argument in a copyright cast involving Andy Warhol's use of another photographer's photos of the Prince, Jus…
- 3 minutes
- 288 views
Related Video
-
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., a case on corporate jurisdiction.
-
Santos-Zacaria v. Garland Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, a case on immigration law.
-
Türkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Türkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States, a case on foreign sovereign immunit…
-
Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, a case on administrative law.
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 3 minutes
- 288 views
-
- 42 seconds
- 75 views
-
- 32 seconds
- 21 views
-
- 3 minutes
- 10 views