Moore v. Harper Oral Argument
2022-12-07T21:59:51-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvMjIzXC8wMDFcLzE2NzA0MjU2NDVfMDAxLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJmaXQiOiJjb3ZlciIsImhlaWdodCI6NTA2fX19The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Moore v. Harper, a case on North Carolina’s congressional districts map and whether state courts can rule on maps governing federal elections. North Carolina’s 2021 congressional map was approved by the Republican-controlled state legislature. Lawsuits were filed, challenging it on the basis of gerrymandering in favor of the GOP. The state Supreme Court agreed and blocked its use in the 2022 midterm elections. A new map was completed by court-appointed experts and used in the elections, but Republican legislative leaders appealed to the Supreme Court. The case hinges on the so-called independent state legislature theory, the idea that the U.S. Constitution allows states' lawmakers to regulate federal elections without checks and balances from other government entities such as courts, governors, election administrators, or independent commissions.
On June 27, 2023, the Court in a 6-3 ruling rejected the independent state legislature theory.
On June 27, 2023, the Court in a 6-3 ruling rejected the independent state legislature theory.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Moore v. Harper, a case on North Carolina’s congressional districts map and whether state courts can… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Moore v. Harper, a case on North Carolina’s congressional districts map and whether state courts can rule on maps governing federal elections. North Carolina’s 2021 congressional map was approved by the Republican-controlled state legislature. Lawsuits were filed, challenging it on the basis of gerrymandering in favor of the GOP. The state Supreme Court agreed and blocked its use in the 2022 midterm elections. A new map was completed by court-appointed experts and used in the elections, but Republican legislative leaders appealed to the Supreme Court. The case hinges on the so-called independent state legislature theory, the idea that the U.S. Constitution allows states' lawmakers to regulate federal elections without checks and balances from other government entities such as courts, governors, election administrators, or independent commissions.
On June 27, 2023, the Court in a 6-3 ruling rejected the independent state legislature theory. close
Resources
- Moore v. Harper Decision (6-3)
U.S. Supreme Court
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and tap the screen to see the at the bottom of the player. Tap the to see a complete list of all Points of Interest - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and move your cursor over the video to see the . Click on the marker to see the description and watch.
You can also click the in the lower left of the video player to see a complete list of all Points of Interest from this program - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Ketanji Brown Jackson Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Neal Katyal Constitutional and Appellate Law Attorney - Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
David H. Thompson Attorney
-
Donald B. Verrilli Jr. Attorney
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Moore v. Harper Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $9.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
United States v. Texas Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Texas, a case on whether the Biden administration’s policy to…
-
Ciminelli v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Ciminelli v. United States, a case on the “right to control” theory and…
-
Health and Hospital Corp v. Talevski Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Health and Hospital Corp v. Talevski, a case concerning spending clause…
-
Jones v. Hendrix Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jones v. Hendrix, a case on challenging convictions of crime that are no…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 5 minutes
- 178 views
-
- 27 seconds
- 78 views
-
- 18 seconds
- 58 views
-
- 20 seconds
- 41 views