Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products Oral Argument
2023-03-27T23:54:58-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvMmZkXC8wMDJcLzE2Nzk5NzU3MzFfMDAyLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJmaXQiOiJjb3ZlciIsImhlaWdodCI6NTA2fX19The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products, a case on trademark law centering on a dog toy that mimics the Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 whiskey bottle. VIP Products began selling the “Bad Spaniels” toy in 2014. A district court ruled in favor of Jack Daniel’s. On appeal, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled the toy was “an expressive work” with First Amendment protections. The Supreme Court would decide which conditions and criteria will be used to determine infringement or protected First Amendment speech in cases involving another company’s use of a trademark for its commercial product.
The Court later ruled in favor of Jack Daniel’s.
The Court later ruled in favor of Jack Daniel’s.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products, a case on trademark law centering on a dog toy that mimics the Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 whiskey… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products, a case on trademark law centering on a dog toy that mimics the Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 whiskey bottle. VIP Products began selling the “Bad Spaniels” toy in 2014. A district court ruled in favor of Jack Daniel’s. On appeal, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled the toy was “an expressive work” with First Amendment protections. The Supreme Court would decide which conditions and criteria will be used to determine infringement or protected First Amendment speech in cases involving another company’s use of a trademark for its commercial product.
The Court later ruled in favor of Jack Daniel’s. close
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Lisa Blatt Attorney -
Bennett Cooper Attorney
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Matthew Guarnieri Assistant to the Solicitor General Department of Justice->Office of the Solicitor General
- Ketanji Brown Jackson Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc. Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arbitron Austria GMBH v. Hetronic International, Inc., a case on U.S.…
-
Lora v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lora v. United States, a case on federal criminal sentencing laws.
-
Samia v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Samia v. United States, a case on a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights and…
-
Slack Technologies v. Pirani Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Slack Technologies v. Pirani, a case on securities law.
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 14 seconds
- 25 views
-
- 48 seconds
- 12 views
-
- 2 minutes
- 10 views
-
- 2 minutes
- 5 views