United States v. Rahimi Oral Argument
2023-11-08T02:02:12-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvZGU0XC8wMDNcLzE2OTkzNzQ4NzRfMDAzLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJmaXQiOiJjb3ZlciIsImhlaWdodCI6NTA2fX19The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case on whether people under domestic violence protective orders can have guns, currently prohibited under federal law. In 2020 a Texas court issued a two-year order and revoked the gun license of Zackey Rahimi after his then-girlfriend requested it in response to a 2019 incident in which he allegedly threatened and pushed her inside a car, and fired his gun at a witness. After this incident, he reportedly continued making gun threats her. After the order was in place, police investigated multiple shootings with Mr. Rahimi as the suspect. Police searched and found guns in his home. Mr. Rahimi was prosecuted for violating the federal statute banning guns while under a domestic violence order. Mr. Rahimi claimed his Second Amendment rights were violated. The federal government disagreed and argued they met the burden of proof to regulate gun access of domestic abusers.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case on whether people under domestic violence protective orders can have guns, currently… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case on whether people under domestic violence protective orders can have guns, currently prohibited under federal law. In 2020 a Texas court issued a two-year order and revoked the gun license of Zackey Rahimi after his then-girlfriend requested it in response to a 2019 incident in which he allegedly threatened and pushed her inside a car, and fired his gun at a witness. After this incident, he reportedly continued making gun threats her. After the order was in place, police investigated multiple shootings with Mr. Rahimi as the suspect. Police searched and found guns in his home. Mr. Rahimi was prosecuted for violating the federal statute banning guns while under a domestic violence order. Mr. Rahimi claimed his Second Amendment rights were violated. The federal government disagreed and argued they met the burden of proof to regulate gun access of domestic abusers. close
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and tap the screen to see the at the bottom of the player. Tap the to see a complete list of all Points of Interest - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and move your cursor over the video to see the . Click on the marker to see the description and watch.
You can also click the in the lower left of the video player to see a complete list of all Points of Interest from this program - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Ketanji Brown Jackson Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Matthew Wright Attorney
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
United States v. Rahimi Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Vidal v. Elster Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Vidal v. Elster, on trademark law concerning an application to the Patent Office to trademark a…
-
O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, concerning public officials who use social media to…
-
Lindke v. Freed Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lindke v. Freed, a case on public officials who use social media to communicate with the public and…
-
Culley v. Marshall Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Culley v. Marshall, concerning post-seizure probable cause hearings at the…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 35 minutes
- 5 views
-
- 3 minutes
- 5 views
-
- 13 seconds
- 1 view
-
- 31 seconds
- 1 view