Cantero v. Bank of America Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America, a case on the National Bank Act.
Garland v. Cargill Oral Argument
2024-02-28T21:00:09-05:00
https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvZmVmXC8wMDFcLzE3MDkxMzI5NzZfMDAxLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJmaXQiOiJjb3ZlciIsImhlaWdodCI6NDgwfX19?
In Garland v. Cargil oral arguments, the Supreme Court considered whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has the authority to regulate bump stocks in the same way it regulates machine guns, which are illegal and banned under federal law. A bump stock is a device that enables semi-automatic rifles to fire almost like machine guns. The Trump administration in 2018 enacted a bump stock ban in response to a 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas, where a gunman used a bump stock with his rifle to kill 58 people and wound more than 400 others. This was the United States' deadliest mass shooting in history. Shortly after the ban’s enactment, Michael Cargill, an owner of two bump stocks, filed suit.
In a 6-3 decision, the Court later struck down the ban.
In a 6-3 decision, the Court later struck down the ban.
In Garland v. Cargil oral arguments, the Supreme Court considered whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has the authorit… read more
In Garland v. Cargil oral arguments, the Supreme Court considered whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has the authority to regulate bump stocks in the same way it regulates machine guns, which are illegal and banned under federal law. A bump stock is a device that enables semi-automatic rifles to fire almost like machine guns. The Trump administration in 2018 enacted a bump stock ban in response to a 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas, where a gunman used a bump stock with his rifle to kill 58 people and wound more than 400 others. This was the United States' deadliest mass shooting in history. Shortly after the ban’s enactment, Michael Cargill, an owner of two bump stocks, filed suit.
In a 6-3 decision, the Court later struck down the ban. close
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and tap the screen to see the at the bottom of the player. Tap the to see a complete list of all Points of Interest - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and move your cursor over the video to see the . Click on the marker to see the description and watch.
You can also click the in the lower left of the video player to see a complete list of all Points of Interest from this program - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brian Fletcher Principal Deputy Solicitor General Department of Justice->Office of the Solicitor General
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Ketanji Brown Jackson Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Jonathan F. Mitchell Attorney Austin
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Garland v. Cargill Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
-
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, a case c…
-
Diaz v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Diaz v. United States, a case concerning criminal law and the federal rules of …
-
Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, a case on interstate water rights.
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 23 seconds
- 20 views
-
- 57 seconds
- 12 views
-
- 32 seconds
- 9 views
-
- 2 minutes
- 6 views