Radio Special
Historic Supreme Court Oral Argument: New Process Steel v. NLRB
2013-09-14T17:57:28-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJkZWZhdWx0c1wvQ2FwaXRvbF9kZWZhdWx0LWltYWdlLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJmaXQiOiJjb3ZlciIsImhlaWdodCI6NTA2fX19From 2010, New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board.
In 2008, the union representing employees at a New Process Steel plant in Butler, Indiana failed to reach an agreement over a new contract with the company. The union subsequently filed unfair labor practices claims with the National Labor Relations Board arguing that New Process Steel failed to honor its collective bargaining agreement to deal with the union as the exclusive representative of employees of the plant. A two-member panel of the NLRB agreed with the union. On appeal, New Process Steel argued that the NLRB’s decision was invalid because a provision of the NLRB act requires that three members of the five member national labor relations board shall “at all times” constitute a quorum. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit disagreed and affirmed the judgment of the board. The case eventually was accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court.
From 2010, New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board.
In 2008, the union representing employees at a New Process Steel plant in B…
read more
From 2010, New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board.
In 2008, the union representing employees at a New Process Steel plant in Butler, Indiana failed to reach an agreement over a new contract with the company. The union subsequently filed unfair labor practices claims with the National Labor Relations Board arguing that New Process Steel failed to honor its collective bargaining agreement to deal with the union as the exclusive representative of employees of the plant. A two-member panel of the NLRB agreed with the union. On appeal, New Process Steel argued that the NLRB’s decision was invalid because a provision of the NLRB act requires that three members of the five member national labor relations board shall “at all times” constitute a quorum. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit disagreed and affirmed the judgment of the board. The case eventually was accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court. close
In 2008, the union representing employees at a New Process Steel plant in Butler, Indiana failed to reach an agreement over a new contract with the company. The union subsequently filed unfair labor practices claims with the National Labor Relations Board arguing that New Process Steel failed to honor its collective bargaining agreement to deal with the union as the exclusive representative of employees of the plant. A two-member panel of the NLRB agreed with the union. On appeal, New Process Steel argued that the NLRB’s decision was invalid because a provision of the NLRB act requires that three members of the five member national labor relations board shall “at all times” constitute a quorum. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit disagreed and affirmed the judgment of the board. The case eventually was accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court.
From 2010, New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board. In 2008, the union representing employees at a New Process Steel plant in B… read more
From 2010, New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board.
In 2008, the union representing employees at a New Process Steel plant in Butler, Indiana failed to reach an agreement over a new contract with the company. The union subsequently filed unfair labor practices claims with the National Labor Relations Board arguing that New Process Steel failed to honor its collective bargaining agreement to deal with the union as the exclusive representative of employees of the plant. A two-member panel of the NLRB agreed with the union. On appeal, New Process Steel argued that the NLRB’s decision was invalid because a provision of the NLRB act requires that three members of the five member national labor relations board shall “at all times” constitute a quorum. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit disagreed and affirmed the judgment of the board. The case eventually was accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court. close
Related Video
-
United States v. Windsor Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Windsor, docket number 12-307, a case challenging the Defense …
-
Presidential Recess Appointment Power Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on the president’s recess appointment powers. In the case National Labor Relations…
-
CBS v. FCC Oral Argument
Oral arguments were heard at the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in CBS v. FCC. The case concerned the CBS televisio…
-
U.S. v. Moussaoui Second Oral Argument
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, heard oral argument in U.S. v. Moussaoui. The Court would dec…